Most outbound dies on one decision: who to write to this week. Ami has already made it 17,707 times and kept score. Built on GPT-6 Astra and every one of those campaigns, it reads your website, picks the buyers who actually convert, and plans backwards from the number you need: leads, senders, weeks. If the list you asked for won't work, it says so before it builds anything. Approve the plan and it runs the outreach, watches every campaign, and fixes what slips. 19,854 booked meetings behind it.
Building AiSDR has made me rethink how much of sales can be solved by automating the tasks.
We started with prospect research, writing outreach, and handling replies. But I kept joining customer calls to help answer more basic questions: Who should we target? What should we offer? Why would someone care right now? What should we change when nobody responds?
I once paid an outbound agency $30,000 and got zero meetings in six months.
When we built AiSDR, I learned how easy it is to automate the emails while leaving the hardest decisions to the customer: who to contact, why now, and what to offer.
Can I drive Ami from my own agents? That is; my research agent finds the accounts, hands them to Ami over an API or MCP and gets the booked meetings back into my stack. Or is it built to own the whole loop?
Report
I like how Ami gives you an argument. You don't just get a campaign strategy handed to you and have to take it as-is. You can push back on the audience, explain why you disagree, suggest a different direction and Ami adjusts based on your feedback. It'll also tell you what might be off with your idea and how to make the audience or strategy stronger. And that back-and-forth keeps going until you're genuinely happy with what's about to launch.
@anna_rozhkova2, thank you for flagging that. This is really one of the core things that makes it different. Often we have outreach ideas that are not likely to work and Ami knows that and helps us avoid these mistakes
Report
@yuriy_zaremba, for sure, it prevents mistakes before they happen and avoids burning credits on wrong strategies.
Report
Congrats on the launch team!
The way Ami plans backwards from your target number (leads, senders, weeks) is really clever. Solving the "who to write to" problem before writing a single email is exactly what outbound has been missing.
Can I drive Ami from my own agents? That is; my research agent finds the accounts, hands them to Ami over an API or MCP and gets the booked meetings back into my stack. Or is it built to own the whole loop?
I like how Ami gives you an argument. You don't just get a campaign strategy handed to you and have to take it as-is. You can push back on the audience, explain why you disagree, suggest a different direction and Ami adjusts based on your feedback. It'll also tell you what might be off with your idea and how to make the audience or strategy stronger. And that back-and-forth keeps going until you're genuinely happy with what's about to launch.
Ami AI
@anna_rozhkova2, thank you for flagging that. This is really one of the core things that makes it different. Often we have outreach ideas that are not likely to work and Ami knows that and helps us avoid these mistakes
@yuriy_zaremba, for sure, it prevents mistakes before they happen and avoids burning credits on wrong strategies.
Congrats on the launch team!
The way Ami plans backwards from your target number (leads, senders, weeks) is really clever. Solving the "who to write to" problem before writing a single email is exactly what outbound has been missing.
Excited to see where this goes!
Ami AI
@arina_gertsoig, we want to get it to a point, where it works like "/goal" in Codex
An AI agent that actually pushes back when a list won't work is huge—most tools just burn through leads blindly. Congrats on the launch! 🚀
Ami AI
@chanaka_jayasena, sad, but true. Precision and experience is what makes Ami different