Help us design a security report you'd actually trust (free scan inside)

Most security reports fail the same way: 40 pages of "possible" issues, and nobody can tell which three are real. We built Xseth to fix that, and now we want your help deciding what the report itself should look like.

Quick recap of what Xseth does: it looks at your web app from the outside, the way an attacker would, narrows thousands of URLs down to the few worth testing, then validates each one. No install, no code access, no accounts. A finding is only marked PROVEN when a deterministic check confirms it, never on an AI's word alone. Everything else is labelled refuted, inconclusive, not tested or false positive.

Here's the vote. If you got a report on your own app tomorrow, what would you want at the top?

A. The proof: the exact request and response, so you can replay it yourself in 30 seconds

B. The fix: what to change, written for your stack (Supabase policy, Next.js middleware, Firebase rule...)

C. The honest gaps: a clear list of what we did not test, so you know where you're still blind

D. The retest: a way to confirm the fix actually closed it, not just that the code changed

Reply with your letter, and tell us what would make you stop reading a report and close the tab. That second answer is the one we learn the most from.

Want to shape it for real? We're taking a small group of free beta users and design partners. Send a domain you own or are authorised to test, we scan it from the outside and send you everything we find, including "nothing" if it's nothing. Design partners also get a direct line to both founders and a real say in what we build next. No pitch attached.

DM me here or email benkriefsyef@xseth.com.