Hiring Should Be Search, Not Submission.

We’re launching something on Product Hunt in a few hours — but before that, I want honest opinions.

What if engineers never had to apply to jobs again?

Think about it.

Today:

AI can generate perfect resumes.

Anyone can stuff buzzwords.

Recruiters screen documents, not builders.

Engineers spend 30–45 days refreshing portals.

Great people miss roles because they didn’t see them in time.

So we asked a simple question:

Why is hiring still submission-based in 2026?

Google doesn’t wait for websites to apply. You search. It ranks. You discover.

So we built hiring like that.

No job postings.

No mass applications.

No resume spam.

Companies search engineers directly through a chatbot.

Example:

“Find me an AI/ML engineer in Indore with 1 year experience.”

It returns structured profiles.

Then the company can say:

“Analyse their GitHub and LeetCode. Give me the real 5 builders.”

Only then does deep verification run:

Commit consistency

Real contributions vs forks

Code depth

LeetCode consistency & difficulty mix

No default scoring. No vanity rating. Verification happens on demand.

Then the company selects candidates and sends automated outreach.

The engineer didn’t apply. Didn’t tweak resume. Didn’t wait 45 days.

They got discovered because they actually built.

Now the uncomfortable question:

If AI can fake resumes…

Should hiring still revolve around resumes?

Or should it revolve around behavior and code?

Before we launch:

Would you trust a search-based hiring model?

Would engineers feel safer without constant scoring?

What are the failure modes of this system?

What am I missing?

I want criticism, not compliments.

Launch in 5 hours.

Let’s discuss.