Every SEO tool I've used hands you a 200-issue report and expects you to take it on faith. We've bet TrustGrowth on the opposite premise audits grounded in Search Console evidence, and proof pages where we publish our own scores publicly, including when a change didn't help.
But I'm genuinely curious where the bar is for other people running sites: what would an SEO tool have to show you before you'd act on its recommendations or pay for them? Before/after data? The methodology? Something else?
Every SEO tool gives you a report. Ours gives you proof. We audit your site from Search Console evidence into one verified TrustGrowth Score — technical SEO, performance, E-E-A-T, keywords, strategy — and publish it as a public proof page, weak signals included, with an embeddable badge and a rank on the public leaderboard. You approve what changes. The playbook we work from, Groundcrew, is open source: inspect the exact instructions, or run them with your own agent. Claim your rank.
