Every validation tool I tried just encouraged me. Friends are polite, co-founders optimistic, ChatGPT is built to agree. So I built the opposite: different AI models prosecute and defend your idea, a 12-model jury scores it, and a formula calculates the verdict, no single model decides. To test if it was actually honest, I ran its own idea through it. It scored 81. I appealed, refused to show my numbers, and it dropped me to 78, with the judge calling my defense "clever but circular." Genuine question for this crowd: do founders actually want an AI that tells them their idea is weak? Or do we secretly prefer the encouragement, even knowing it's useless?
Tribunal of Ideas puts your business idea on trial. Dozens of different AI models play prosecutor, defense, witnesses and a 12-model jury: they search the web for real evidence and competitors, debate live, and reach a calculated verdict, not just one AI's opinion. Walk away with a replayable trial, a shareable verdict card, and a full PDF report with an action plan.
