When we first launched Job Driver, our goal was simple: turn LinkedIn into a high-converting job search CRM so you could auto-track applications with zero effort.
The response was amazing, but our users kept telling us the same thing: "Tracking is great, but tailoring my actual resume and cover letter for every single job description is what's eating up all my time."
I went through 590 conversations between actual VCs and founders, where founders were given brutally specific deck feedback. I wanted to know what they care about, slide by slide. Something kept coming up. Most founders can't clearly show they understand their own business and market. The same gaps over and over: a "why now" that's just "because AI," a problem slide that's a statement instead of a story, an acquisition slide that says "SEO and partnerships" and nothing else.
So I turned every recurring piece of feedback into a fill-in-the-blanks deck each slide tells you what investors want there and gives you the prompt to fill in. I'm calling it Pitchdeck Essentials: a fill-in-the-blanks guide to getting funded.
It just went live: https://www.producthunt.com/prod....
AI visibility is all the buzz right now and IMO the products out there are way to expensive for they do. We just open-sourced auto-geo: A CLI-based GEO engine you can use to create GEO optimized content that gets your brand cited and mentioned by OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok. You can also track your citations and visibility over time.
After auditing my own bank statements, I found 6 subscriptions I'd completely forgotten about totaling $136/month. The manual process of combing through CSVs was painful enough that I built a tool to automate it.
What surprised me most: the hardest part wasn't finding the charges it was actually canceling them. Most services bury the cancel button.
Curious if anyone else here has gone through a similar "wait, I'm paying for WHAT?" moment while building or using fintech tools. What patterns have you noticed?
I've been letting Claude and GPT run commands in my terminal for the last year. Most of the time it's great. The other times I lose half a day to AI mistakes: rm -rf the wrong folder, force-pushing to main, "fixing" a config by quietly overwriting it.
So I built Verlox.
Every command the AI proposes gets turned into a plan first: numbered steps, the real commands, the files each step will touch, and a risk score (low / medium / high) per step. Nothing executes until I approve. Risky things (deletes, force-pushes, production access) always stop and ask separately. Anything the AI deletes or overwrites is copied to a Recovery Vault first, restorable with one click.
