I analysed then turned 590 pitch deck convos between founders and investors into a template

I went through 590 conversations between actual VCs and founders, where founders were given brutally specific deck feedback. I wanted to know what they care about, slide by slide. Something kept coming up. Most founders can't clearly show they understand their own business and market. The same gaps over and over: a "why now" that's just "because AI," a problem slide that's a statement instead of a story, an acquisition slide that says "SEO and partnerships" and nothing else.

So I turned every recurring piece of feedback into a fill-in-the-blanks deck — each slide tells you what investors want there and gives you the prompt to fill in. I'm calling it Pitchdeck Essentials: a fill-in-the-blanks guide to getting funded.

It just went live: https://www.producthunt.com/prod....

Genuinely after feedback here, not upvotes. if you've raised or pitched, which slide do you think founders get most wrong?