Hi all. The title probably said it all, but, i'd like to introduce abit about my new launch: https://www.producthunt.com/prod... - an online image editor much abit like canva and the likes. I had decided to make an easier and faster version of it, one that makes it abit easier packed with some tools that not even canva features. Most notably, the FIT CANVAS feature that lets you instantly resize the editor canvas to fit the objects, images text etc. This makes exporting images at the correct size much easier and faster. Also includes ability to instantly import images from URL, YouTube Thumbnails, Channel BG etc.

You can see the live editor and all the tools it features right here on the live editor guest mode (no signup / signin required): https://canvix.io/editor/editor/...

I would appreciate it if you rate my product launch. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. I will try and answer all questions as soon as possible. Thanks for checking out my post.

Hey everyone

Over the years I kept jumping between different apps just to manage normal life.

Tasks in one app.
Habits in another.
Budgeting somewhere else.
Focus timer in another tab.

Eventually I realized I was spending more time maintaining systems than actually doing things

Implemented 14 day free trial model replacing the old free tier. Users now sign up and get a free account with zero event tracking and must start a trial through Polar checkout with a credit card required to access any features. During the 14-day trial, they get full Pro access with 300K events, 10 sites, unlimited links, a real-time dashboard, UTM tracking, CSV export, custom domains, and everything else. After the trial ends Polar auto-charges $29 per month and upgrades them to Pro. If payment fails, the account goes back to a locked state.

Benefits: The revenue-first model means every paying user has a credit card on file before they even see the dashboard. No more free riders consuming resources. A trial gives full experience, so the conversion rate should be high. Clean separation between trial users and paid users in the database.

I've been producing music for years, mostly with Ableton, and there's one part of the workflow that still feels unnecessarily messy: collaborating with other producers.

You start working on a track together and, before you know it, you're dealing with different project versions, Drive folders, WeTransfer links, missing samples and messages like:

Which version are you working on?

or

Hey, first time here already seeing some really cool stuff on this platform.

Honestly kind of inspired seeing everyone grinding to make their ideas real.

We run an AI-visibility monitoring tool, so we scan brands across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and others. Last week we ran our own brand through it and caught something uncomfortable.

Search "brandscope ai": Google shows us #1 organic. But Google's AI Overview describes a different company with a similar name (wowai.ch). And there's a direct competitor using nearly our exact domain (brandscopeai.com). Three companies, two named BrandScope, all competing for one AI identity.

This isn't an edge case name collisions are the #1 thing we see when brands run their first scan. Powsight gets confused with PowerSight. A brand with a common name finds AI quoting the other company's site. "Mentioned by AI" and "correctly represented by AI" are different problems.

We now split every report into three buckets not mentioned / mentioned-but-wrong-entity / mentioned-without-verifiable-source each with its own next step.

Hey PH community

I'm a solo founder from Barcelona. I have this idea that I'm calling a social restaurant discovery app for international travelers (although it can be for locals as well).
What's the problem I have encountered (and talk with friends and family that they have as well):

Most of us, we are discovering restaurants from Instagram reels and TikTok, we might save them or share them in a group chat, but then it gets messy. Maybe one of us saved the location on Google Maps, just to discover that the Restaurant its on the other end of the city from where you are when you're hungry. Also, in places like Japan, Korea or China, the best and most local places are in the local language, so you need to look in Google Maps in Japanese, Chinese, or Korean (which with ChatGPT is simpler). But all this, in my opinion, it s still messy.
Also, maybe you want to find a new restaurant in the city, we all have that foodie friend that we as for recommendations, but maybe they are not available when we need them (it can happen, they have a life haha), so why not simply go check something that your friend has been to and has rated highly?

There's a pattern on LinkedIn right now that's hard to miss. Every other post opens with a one-line hook, follows a numbered list, and ends with "What would you add?" You can tell within two sentences whether someone used AI or not.

The problem isn't AI writing it's that most AI tools have no idea who you are. They generate from a blank slate every time.