We ve recently launched Dora Station, a new social gaming app created with blind and visually impaired gamers in mind.

We noticed something missing from accessible gaming: having a place where people can connect, chat, meet other gamers, share experiences and simply hang out with a community that understands accessible gaming.

Dora Station is our attempt to build that space.

Think of it as a social hub for blind gamers similar in concept to the community side of platforms like Discord, but designed specifically around the accessibility needs and experiences of blind and visually impaired users.

I ve always been terrible at keeping track of things I find online.

Interesting article? Bookmark it.
Useful tool? Save it.

Definitely coming back to this ? Open another tab.

I built an engine that validates companies against your ICP with cited evidence I'll run 20 of your target accounts free for the first 5 founders here.

Student founder. You describe who you actually sell to, my agents research each company and return fit/unfit verdicts with quotes and sources including honest "couldn't determine" instead of guesses. [One screenshot of a verdict card.] Drop your ICP in a sentence or DM me. Genuine question for everyone else: when you build target lists today, what actually eats the time finding companies, or figuring out if they're worth it?

I somehow forgot we already aggregate votes for media outlets too. Not just politicians and individual articles. You can actually see how people rate BBC, Fox, GB News, NBC etc. and view their charts over time.
So I m finally giving that feature a bit more love.
Also feels like the perfect place to start building out the Home screen properly: a mix of politicians, news, media outlets, trending votes and other stuff instead of just one endless type of content.
Turns out sometimes the best new feature is remembering the features you already built

AI can help people approach difficult Buddhist scriptures, but I think the source text must remain visible and primary. My preferred workflow is to read the canonical passage, compare classical and modern translations, ask narrow questions about specific terms, and verify generated explanations against the text and trusted references.

I built RuShiWoWen ( ) around that source-first approach. It includes 4,515 CBETA texts, parallel reading, contextual AI explanations, Buddhist Q&A, and Chinese, English, and Japanese interfaces.

I had the idea for Shape about 6 months ago.

At the start, development was painfully slow. I d build something, look at it, hate the UI, change it, then change it again 5 minutes later.

The UI looked absolutely horrible.

I also ran into some of the simplest bugs that somehow became incredibly difficult to fix (a basic terminal height bug took me an entire week).

I'm building a small browser-based daily puzzle project, and it made me think about something I'm curious to learn from other makers:

What actually makes users come back to a web product every day?

For daily puzzle or game products, I've been considering things like:

• streaks and progress tracking

• a consistent daily challenge

• leaderboards

• sharing results with friends

• difficulty progression

• unlocking new content

Why we open-sourced RexaDB
We open-sourced RexaDB because we wanted to be fully transparent about what we re building.
Our app already stands on the shoulders of open source: Supabase, Polar.sh, the Pi coding agent, Mastra for workflows, and more. It felt right to give back and put RexaDB itself out there for everyone to see, inspect, and improve.
We also hoped open-sourcing would give us a marketing boost.

It kind of worked we still sit at $0 revenue (lol), but the traffic on our socials jumped and the love from the community has been real. That alone made it worth it.
More than anything, we just love the open-source community and want to support it in every way we can. Opening up RexaDB is one small way of doing that.
GitHub: https://github.com/rexadbapp/RexaDB
Site: https://www.rexadb.app
Would love to hear your thoughts (and stars are always welcome ).

Hey everyone,

I've been building Shaks a lightweight, mobile-first CRM that uses AI to make sure you never drop the ball on a follow-up again.

The problem: Consultants and solo founders are great at closing the first conversation, but terrible at the follow-through. Leads go cold because there's no simple system to track who to nudge, when, and with what.

What it does:

Hi everyone!

Over the past few weeks I've been building Launch Pilot, an AI tool designed to help founders validate SaaS ideas before investing months into development.

Instead of using one generic AI prompt, it runs multiple specialized evaluations that look at areas like product clarity, validation, launch readiness, and potential risks before combining them into a structured report.

The goal isn't to replace user research it's to help founders identify obvious gaps and blind spots earlier.