Webflow agencies: would you pay $49/month to check the whole form-to-Sheet flow?

I'm testing an idea for agencies maintaining 10–30 client sites, especially Webflow forms routed through Make into Google Sheets and email. It isn't built or available to buy yet.

The proposed $49/month pilot would cover up to 20 approved form paths: send one clearly marked test each day, check that its matching row reaches the Sheet and its notification reaches a dedicated test mailbox, then alert after two failed attempts with the last verified step.

Example: form accepted, email received, Sheet row missing. That is more useful than a green "form submitted" check, but it still would NOT prove delivery to your client's real inbox.

Setup would need your approval to read the destination spreadsheet as a Viewer (the whole file, not just test rows) and keep marked tests out of sales reporting. Existing Webflow, Make and email costs stay separate; checks consume their usage allowances. The pilot would be for paid Webflow sites, not Starter sites with the 50-submission lifetime limit.

A scheduled browser test plus a heartbeat may already be enough. I'm trying to find out whether configuring and maintaining that across client sites leaves a problem worth paying to solve.

If you run these flows:

- What was the last failure you had, and how did you discover it?

- What do you use now, and what is still manual?

- Would you consider a $49 first-month pilot once it works on two paths you approve? What would have to be true before you'd pay?

US agencies are especially relevant, but other operators' experience is welcome. Please don't share client data or credentials. Feedback here is enough; there's no signup list or payment request.