Hey Product Hunt! 👋
I built **radiusHQ** after watching a barber friend lose nearly 2 hours every day answering the same questions:
“When are you free?”
“How much does this service cost?”
“Can I book for Saturday?”
He had one link for his profile, another for scheduling, and still spent hours going back and forth in DMs.
I kept thinking: **why can't one link do all of this?**
So I built radiusHQ — a business page that actually takes action.
With one link, your clients can:
• See your services and prices
• Book an available time instantly
• Choose a professional
• Find your important links
• And now, you can **design and customize the page to match your brand**
Change the look, personalize your page, showcase your business, and take bookings — all from one place.
No website. No code. No more “DM to book.”
🎥 Want to see it in action? Watch the 2-minute walkthrough:
https://youtu.be/UzNgsUSa_TM
✨ Prefer exploring it yourself? Try the interactive demo:
https://app.supademo.com/demo/cm...
To celebrate the launch, I'm offering the **Team plan for $69 lifetime** instead of $348/year, limited to the first 200 practitioners.
If you run a service business — or know someone who does — I'd love your feedback:
• Would you replace your current link-in-bio with this?
• What feels like it's still missing?
• What would make radiusHQ a no-brainer for your business?
Thanks for checking it out 🙌
Report
@subhrajbasu The scheduling sprawl I feel most is across a team, where four people each have a booking link and the prospect ends up with three of them in one thread. Does the single link route by context to the right person, or is it one shared calendar behind it? Curious how you do round-robin without losing who owns the relationship.
@artem_fedorovich Yeah — that’s actually the exact problem I wanted RadiusHQ to solve.
It’s one shared booking link, but it’s not just one shared calendar. The business can define the team members, services, and availability, and RadiusHQ handles the routing behind the scenes.
For example, if a salon has 4 stylists, the client can either choose a specific stylist or just choose the service. If they don’t care who they see, RadiusHQ uses fair-load routing to assign the appointment to the right available professional.
The important part is that the booking stays attached to the actual professional who owns the appointment, so you don’t end up with a messy “who is handling this?” situation.
Basically: one link for the customer, intelligent routing behind the scenes, clear ownership for the team.
Replies
radiusHQ - Personal Assistant
@subhrajbasu The scheduling sprawl I feel most is across a team, where four people each have a booking link and the prospect ends up with three of them in one thread. Does the single link route by context to the right person, or is it one shared calendar behind it? Curious how you do round-robin without losing who owns the relationship.
radiusHQ - Personal Assistant
@artem_fedorovich Yeah — that’s actually the exact problem I wanted RadiusHQ to solve.
It’s one shared booking link, but it’s not just one shared calendar. The business can define the team members, services, and availability, and RadiusHQ handles the routing behind the scenes.
For example, if a salon has 4 stylists, the client can either choose a specific stylist or just choose the service. If they don’t care who they see, RadiusHQ uses fair-load routing to assign the appointment to the right available professional.
The important part is that the booking stays attached to the actual professional who owns the appointment, so you don’t end up with a messy “who is handling this?” situation.
Basically: one link for the customer, intelligent routing behind the scenes, clear ownership for the team.