How much explanation do you want from an AI study planner?

I built Ozyplan because most study tools show students everything and leave the hardest decision—what deserves attention first—to the student. Before Saturday’s launch, I’m testing one specific trust question: when a tool tells you what to work on first, what evidence makes you believe it?

Ozyplan currently shows the estimated time, the first step, confidence, why it chose that item, and the alternative it rejected. If you’ve used a planner or coach, which of those actually matters? Is there a point where explanation becomes noise?

If anyone wants to test this with a real syllabus before launch, the first course analysis and briefing are free: https://www.ozyplan.com/