I m launching Ozyplan this Saturday after seeing the same problem with most student planners: they collect every deadline but still leave the student to decide what deserves attention first.
Ozyplan connects to Canvas read-only, imports a calendar feed, or accepts course files. It reads deadlines and requirements, estimates workload and risk, then produces one prioritized daily briefing with the first steps, time estimate, confidence, why that item won, and the alternative it rejected.
The first course analysis and first briefing are free with no card. Pro is $9.99/month after that. I m looking for students willing to test it against a real syllabus and tell me where the first recommendation earns or loses their trust.
I built Ozyplan because most study tools show students everything and leave the hardest decision what deserves attention first to the student. Before Saturday s launch, I m testing one specific trust question: when a tool tells you what to work on first, what evidence makes you believe it?
Ozyplan currently shows the estimated time, the first step, confidence, why it chose that item, and the alternative it rejected. If you ve used a planner or coach, which of those actually matters? Is there a point where explanation becomes noise?
If anyone wants to test this with a real syllabus before launch, the first course analysis and briefing are free: https://www.ozyplan.com/
Connect Canvas, a calendar feed, or upload course materials. Ozyplan reads deadlines and requirements, estimates workload, then gives one daily briefing: what to do, how, how long, why it wins, and what it rejected. First analysis and briefing are free; Pro is $9.99/month.
