Korven
p/korven
AI agents can act. But they have zero security
0 reviews1 follower
Start new thread
trending
Aniket Giri

7d ago

AIP vs prompt guardrails - why we chose cryptography

Most AI safety tools use prompt-level filters:

- "Don't do anything harmful"

- LLM-as-judge (another model watching the first one)

- Retrieval-based guardrails

Aniket Giri

7d ago

Show me your scariest AI agent failure story

We've all seen it - an agent goes rogue during a demo, a test agent

accesses production data, a chatbot sends emails it shouldn't.

What's the worst thing an AI agent has done in your system?

(Bonus points if it happened in production )

Aniket Giri

7d ago

@observe - free agent debugging before you need security

We just shipped v0.4.0 with @observe, a free, lightweight way to

see what your agents are doing.

from aip_protocol import passport, observe

Aniket Giri

9d ago

Why do we trust AI agents with zero verification?

Honest question for the community:

We require HTTPS for every web request. We require OAuth for every API call. We require 2FA for every login.

But AI agents? We let them execute actions with nothing more than a system prompt and a prayer.

An agent can transfer money, delete data, email customers and the only "security" is hoping the LLM follows instructions. Prompt injection can bypass that in one message.

Aniket Giri

6h ago

Korven - AI agents can act. But they have zero security

We require HTTPS for web requests, OAuth for APIs, 2FA for logins. But AI agents? Zero identity. Zero authorization. Zero kill switch. AIP is the missing security layer: Ed25519 identity per agent (DID-based) Cryptographic boundary enforcement - not prompt guardrails Instant global revocation - one API call <1ms verification, deterministic (not probabilistic) @observe - free agent debugging (NEW v0.4.0) Open-source. Python + TypeScript. Works with LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen.