Solo founder from Helsinki, building AI travel tools, launching on PH July 22

by•

Hey everyone. I'm Satchmo, indie founder based in Helsinki, Finland. Been building Sujova () for the past several months, an AI trip planner built specifically for couples and small groups. The idea came from a trip to Riga, Latvia where planning in a group Whatsapp thread nearly broke us.

Built it solo with Lovable, no coding background. Live product, Paddle payments, localized in English, Finnish, and Spanish. First real user feedback came from a Finnish woman who used it on a road trip through Norway and Finland and sent me an unsolicited testimonial.

Targeting July 22 for my PH launch. Still learning the distribution side of things, which is honestly harder than building. Happy to be here and looking forward to learning from people who've been through it.

28 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
The Riga whatsapp-thread origin story is great, that kind of real frustration usually makes the best products. And the distribution part hits home. I'm building solo too and shipping the product turned out to be the easy half. The thing that's helped me most is talking to a handful of real users way earlier than felt comfortable, well before launch, so PH day isn't the first time anyone's heard of it. Are you lining people up to try Sujova ahead of July 22, or saving it all for launch day?

 This hits home. I've had a handful of real users ahead of launch, one completed a full road trip using Sujova and sent me an unsolicited testimonial, which told me more than any analytics could. Definitely not saving it all for July 22. The plan is to have 20+ committed supporters lined up before launch day, people who've either used it or followed the build. Still working on getting there. What's helped you most for lining up supporters specifically?

Welcome, Satchmo!

I smiled at the WhatsApp group story because that's exactly how a lot of great products start—solving a frustration you've experienced yourself.

I'm also a solo founder, and I completely relate to your point about distribution being harder than building. Wishing you a successful launch on July 22. Looking forward to seeing Sujova on Product Hunt!

 Thanks! Yeah, that Riga WhatsApp group was the moment I thought 'there has to be a better way.' What are you building?

 Thanks! I'm building Unblank.

It helps people prepare for important conversations, stay on track when the pressure is on, and improve afterward with feedback. The idea came from realizing how many people blank out in interviews, sales calls, presentations, and other high-stakes conversations.

Still early, but it's been a fun problem to work on. Good luck with your July launch. I hope it goes really well!

 Unblank sounds like it solves a genuinely painful moment, everyone knows that blank-out feeling. Thanks for sharing, good luck with it!

Hi Satchmo!! This is Omkar from India. Honestly as soon as I read your post I saw myself writing a similar post may be 1 week from now because I am also building something solo, completely non technical background and just using chatGPT and Lovable to build an app to solve a problem which I experience and have seen around me. I am 80% done building my product and launch and distribution is something what my next challenge will be, which is already giving me chills. i would love to learn from you and your invaluable experiences

Sujova is positioned around group / couple planning, but your strongest evidence so far looks more like single-planner or one-traveler feedback.

That road trip testimonial is valuable, but it doesn’t yet prove the shared planning workflow.

So I’d separate two groups:

Supporters:
people who will support, comment, or upvote on launch day.

Validation users:
people who actually have an upcoming trip and are willing to create, edit, share, and plan with someone else inside Sujova.

Those two signals shouldn’t be mixed.

A few concrete places where the validation user profile already appears:

  1. A couple planning a 3–4 day summer road trip from Chicago, with mixed preferences and safety/comfort as part of the planning.
    That’s useful because a generic itinerary may miss context that matters to both travelers.

  2. A large family planning a Europe trip with 9 adults and 3 children.
    That’s useful because the hard part is not only destination ideas, but turning many constraints into a plan the group can discuss.

For each one, I wouldn’t ask “do you like AI trip planners?”

I’d ask:

  • are you planning this alone or together;

  • what tool are you using now;

  • would you use a shared editable itinerary;

  • would the second person actually comment, edit, or approve anything;

  • would you come back to the plan 24–48 hours later.

If people only generate one itinerary and leave, Sujova may be closer to an AI itinerary generator.

If they edit, share, discuss, and come back with another person involved, that’s a much stronger signal that the group planning workflow is real.