HAQQ Legal AI on Mobile - Bringing legal understanding to anyone with a phone

We built HAQQ because understanding legal situations shouldn’t depend on who you know or whether you can afford to “just ask a lawyer.” Today, HAQQ Legal AI is available on mobile. Upload a contract. Ask a legal question. Get structured, jurisdiction-aware legal work with risk flags and exportable outputs. Not generic chat. Legal reasoning powered by Justinian®. Know exactly where you stand, wherever you are.

Add a comment

Replies

Best

The ability to upload a contract and instantly get risk flags sounds incredibly useful for founders and freelancers :))

 Thank you Himani :) That instant-flag moment is the one we obsessed over — upload, and within seconds you know what to worry about. Founders and freelancers feel that pain most.

Love the mobile-first approach. Most legal issues happen away from a desk, not while sitting in front of a computer. :D

 Exactly the thesis — you don't get to schedule when a landlord, a client, or a contract throws a problem at you. It happens in the moment, on your phone. Glad it resonates :D

how HAQQ handles jurisdiction-specific regulations. Does the reasoning adapt automatically based on the uploaded document?

 Yes — it reads the jurisdiction signals in the document (governing law, parties, language) and adapts the analysis rather than defaulting to one legal system. Where the document is silent or contradictory, it flags that instead of guessing.

Can users compare multiple versions of a contract and identify legal changes automatically?

 Version diffing is on the build list — not just text changes but flagging which edits actually shift your legal exposure (a one-word change in an indemnity clause matters more than a reworded paragraph). That's the version worth shipping. Glad it caught your eye, Nuseir.

Have you considered adding a collaboration mode where lawyers and clients can review AI-generated drafts together?

 It's on the roadmap. Right now the mobile flow is built for the individual, but shared review — lawyer and client on the same draft with comments — is one of the most-requested things we hear. Would love to know what "good" looks like for you there.

Can HAQQ explain legal risks in plain language for non-legal professionals?

 That's the core of it — plain-language explanation is the default, not a "simplify" toggle. If a non-lawyer can't understand the risk, we haven't done our job. The legalese stays available if you want it, but the headline is always human.