What makes a web security scanner genuinely useful for developers?

I've been thinking about this while building a web security assessment tool, and I realized that many scanners overwhelm users with hundreds of warnings but provide very little guidance on what actually matters.

In your experience, what makes a security scanner genuinely valuable?

Some questions I'd love to hear your thoughts on:

• Do you prefer a simple summary or a detailed technical report?

• Should findings be prioritized by severity, exploitability, or business impact?

• How important are confidence scores in deciding whether to trust a finding?

• What's the biggest frustration you've had with existing security scanners?

• Which security checks do you think are often overlooked but should be included?

From my own experience, I believe helping users understand what to fix first is often more valuable than simply reporting every possible issue.

I'm looking forward to hearing different perspectives from developers, security engineers, and founders. I think this could lead to a great discussion about how security tools can become more practical and developer-friendly.