What feature did users completely ignore that you thought would be a hit?
by•
While building products, I've noticed something surprising.
The features I spent the most time building were often the ones users barely touched.
Meanwhile, a few "small" features I almost skipped ended up becoming the reason people kept using the product.
It reminded me that founders are often poor judges of what users actually value until real people start using the product.
Have you experienced something similar?
What feature did you expect everyone to love, and what unexpectedly became the most valuable instead?
28 views
Replies
NINA
I think this is why founders should be careful about measuring features by the effort they took to build.
Users don't care how difficult something was to implement. They care whether it solves a problem they have right now.
I've started thinking of every feature as a hypothesis rather than an achievement. Until real users prove it's valuable, it's just an educated guess.
@varun1jan I like the idea of treating every feature as a hypothesis.
I've found it's often better to ship a simple version, measure whether people actually use it, and then decide whether it's worth investing more time. It's much easier to improve something users already value than to convince them to use something they never asked for.