There are only two kinds of founders left, and one group has already lost

The first group tore their workflow apart and rebuilt it around AI. The second group is waiting for the dust to settle before committing to anything.
The waiters have a defensible case. Half the AI tools from 2024 are dead, the best model changes monthly, and rebuilding your stack every quarter has a real cost. In most platform shifts, the fast follower wins (think Apple).
But this shift compounds in a way that previous ones didn't. When a competitor retools around agents, they don't get a one-time productivity bump. Their iteration speed itself changes, so the gap between you and them widens every week you wait.
I've felt this firsthand. We're 3 people, and we replaced our design agency by migrating our entire marketing site in 2 days with AI-assisted coding. The same project cost us multiples more and weeks of back-and-forth the old way. And honestly, a year later, the 2-day version already feels slow.
The dust never settles, because the thing kicking it up is the thing improving. Waiting for AI to stabilize is waiting for the ocean to finish waving.
Could be wrong on timing. Distribution, enterprise moats, and a fat war chest can let slow movers coast for years, and plenty of "AI-native" workflows are pure theater, so retooling badly is worse than waiting.
But losing here won't look like dying. It'll look like shipping at last year's speed while the market suddenly stops comparing you to the top.

Replies
WebCurate.co
I agree with the general idea. You don't need to adopt every new AI tool, but completely ignoring them isn't really an option anymore.
Even small improvements in your workflow add up over time, especially for small teams.