Fundraisly - AI fundraising agent that finds investors and books meetings

@troy_mcalpin1 Thank you, really appreciate your kind words!

@troy_mcalpin1 Thanks for checking it out!

@millwiller For investors, we run automated analysis on their completed deals, not their stated thesis, which is often outdated or deliberately vague. What sectors did they actually back? What stage, check size, business model, and geography patterns emerge from their real portfolio? A fund that says "we invest in enterprise software" but has 60% consumer deals in their last 20 investments tells you something their website never would.

And you're right about the contact layer too, matching to the right fund is only half of it. We go to partner level, mapping which specific partner has the relevant thesis 🚀

@annmast  @millwiller Anna covered it well. Real respect for the depth of the question💪

@crypteed Ideally, 1–2 months before you want to start taking meetings. That gives us time to build the infrastructure, map your network, and prepare the funnel. Starting too late means you're scrambling. Starting early means you launch your round with a full pipeline already warm.

@crypteed Usually we start before the round is live so we can prepare for it. So it seems the timing is great right now!

@nik_shilov Ha, love the energy and honestly not a crazy idea, some VCs are way more responsive on Twitter/X than email.

Right now we're focused on email, LinkedIn, and warm intros through your existing network. Those are the channels where investor attention is most consistent and measurable for fundraising. Social platforms like Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook are harder to systematize without crossing into exactly the stalking territory you mentioned 😄

That said, it's on our radar. The less formal channels are genuinely underexplored for fundraising. If enough founders ask for it, it moves up the roadmap, so consider this noted!

@nik_shilov Appreciate the support!

@islam_midov Same here. I'm also a former VC, and Dave, Fundraisly's co-founder, has personally raised over $1B in capital. We know this pain firsthand, which is exactly why we're committed to solving it. 🙌

@islam_midov That's so true. Hope Fundraisly can fix that!

@kristina__grits Honest answer: we don't offer a blanket money-back guarantee if a campaign underperforms. A lot of the cost is front-loaded into dedicated domains, warm-up, scripts, infrastructure, and targeting work that happens in weeks 1 to 2 regardless of outcome. What we do instead is screen on the consultation call. If your deck, ask, or timing isn't ready, we say so; the operating range is 10 to 50 qualified meetings within 90 days, with many founders landing around 20 to 40, but we also explain which client segments are more likely to hit that range.

@kristina__grits Appreciate the support!

@mituhin a small network is exactly the problem we built for!

Here's what we do: we pull together a database of investors most relevant to your round, identify their portfolio founders, and find their contact info. We also map relevant angel investors in your space. Then we automatically expand your LinkedIn network to include these connections and run targeted outreach to your new network on your behalf.

So you start with a small network and end up with a warm, relevant one, built specifically around the investors you're trying to reach. By the time outreach goes out, it's not cold anymore. 🚀

@mituhin I can definitely say that at least it's worth a try! We can help you build your network or see what we can do with your current network list.

@ksoiss All outreach goes as you: your name and your company domain. Investors see an email from you@yourcompany.com, not from Fundraisly. We operate behind the scenes on targeting, infrastructure, scripts, and coordination.

@tina_chhabra Cold outreach opens the door, it's how you find who's actually interested right now. But you're right that warm intros are what converts a conversation into a check. We think of them as two stages of the same pipeline, not competing approaches. Cold surfaces the signal, warm closes the gap. 🙌

@tina_chhabra Hi Tina, totally agree with you. We usually use the Warm feature to get amazing warm intros to investors that we found from portfolio founders in the network.

@nickanisimov Great question! And yes, having multiple paths to the same investor is actually a really good problem to have 😄

When there are several possible intro routes, we rank them across a few dimensions: relationship strength (how frequently and recently you've communicated with the connector), and the connector's own proximity to the investor (a direct portfolio founder beats a mutual LinkedIn connection).

Would love to get you into the warm intro feature 🚀