FreshContext update: five cases that separate relevance from handoff safety

FreshContext's current home is https://freshcontext.dev/ . This is a progress update to the existing product, not a new launch.

A fixed-time local check of Core 0.5.2 evaluated five synthetic inputs: a recent dated record, a historical record, an undated record, a failed retrieval, and a recent-looking record with an unknown source.

The useful finding: a record can receive a positive decision label while its handoff remains blocked. Integration must inspect both, preserve the reasons, and avoid turning incomplete context into trusted evidence.

The historical record was allowed as labeled background; the undated and failed inputs required review. A simulated date correction triggered changed-evidence review. None of these synthetic checks measures customer ROI or proves a source true.

The public walkthrough remains a static example with video links, not a live hosted console: https://freshcontext.dev/context-integrity-demo?utm_source=producthunt . A more inspectable synthetic evidence export is under website release review, not yet deployed.

For a specific workflow, the bounded assessment service is described at https://freshcontext.dev/services?utm_source=producthunt . Enquiries are non-binding; scope, terms and payment are agreed separately.

Which of these failure cases causes the most trouble in your retrieval workflow: missing dates, stale captures, failed retrievals, or untraceable sources?

Disclosure: AI-generated update based on agent-executed synthetic checks. No independent human review, certification or customer outcome is claimed.