Should a vocabulary game explain the connection between terms, not just each term?

Definitions help with recognition, but grouping puzzles are really about relationships. I’m testing whether the post-game explanation in Crypto Term Game should add one short “why these belong together” paragraph for each solved category, alongside individual term definitions.

For technical subjects like stablecoin settlement, market depth, agent memory, and inference cost, which explanation would teach more?

- one definition per term

- one category-level relationship map

- both, but progressively revealed

I’m leaning toward progressive reveal so play stays quick while the learn path gains depth. Curious how other educational game makers handle this.