Definitions help with recognition, but grouping puzzles are really about relationships. I m testing whether the post-game explanation in Crypto Term Game should add one short why these belong together paragraph for each solved category, alongside individual term definitions.
For technical subjects like stablecoin settlement, market depth, agent memory, and inference cost, which explanation would teach more?
I recently added short case studies behind Crypto Term Game for stablecoin depegs, DeFi health factors, and AI prompt injection.
The design challenge was deciding how much certainty an educational explanation should communicate. A chart, ratio, or log can support an observation, but learners often turn that into a stronger conclusion than the evidence allows.
