Bond - The AI to-do list that does itself
by•
Bond is an AI Chief of Staff for executives. It connects to your tools, learns how your company works, and turns scattered tasks into a self-managing to-do list that always knows what you need to do next.
You can ask Bond to prepare you for your next meeting, draft a follow-up, send an email, create action items, identify blockers, surface risks, or delegate tasks to team members.
Replies
Extremely cool
@adamcohenhillel thank you adam!
It's really a good problem to solve. In today's era there are so many tools available and sometime deciding which one to use to increase the productivity, we end losing the time only. The "self-managing to-do list" framing is really awesome.
However a quick question: If I finish a call where some action items were verbally agreed on but never written down, can Bond pick those up from a calendar event + transcript and automatically surface them ? Also I have recently Zoom is also providing something similar, how are you differentiating from Zoom ?
@abhishek_srivastava_eng Thanks Abhishek, could not agree more 🙏
For your question: Yesss, if the call has a transcript or meeting notes connected, Bond can combine that with the calendar context, pull out the verbal action items, identify owners, and surface them as todos with evidence back to the meeting.
Zoom can summarize a Zoom meeting... but Bond is actively trying to manage the follow-through. So if an action item comes up in a call, then gets discussed later in Slack, then needs an email follow-up, Bond connects those dots and keeps tracking it until it's resolved.
Solid launch for Bond. What was the hardest part to get right so far?Good to see Bond: The AI to-do list that does itself ship. Which use case are you seeing the most demand for?
@borrellbr Thank you, Ignacio!
Hardest part so far has been getting from "AI finds tasks" to "AI finds the right tasks." It's easy to create another noisy list. Much harder to reliably understand context, merge duplicates, avoid stale todos, and surface the few things that actually matter today.
The use case with the most demand so far is follow-through: catching the things that slip between email, Slack, meetings, and memory. Unanswered follow-ups, blockers, decisions waiting on someone, draft replies, delegation nudges, aka the operational loose ends that executives and chiefs of staff spend all day chasing.
That's why we like this framing, the real value isn't storing tasks, it's clearing as many of them as possible. What usecase did you have in mind for Bond?
@borrellbr Thanks! Easily the hardest part: signal-to-noise. It's deceptively easy to build something that connects to all your tools and then proudly dumps everything back at you. A lot of what's out there does exactly that, and it just becomes another firehose with an AI label slapped on. Genuinely deciding "this matters to you, this doesn't" is brutally hard, and it's where we've spent the most blood. A list you can't trust is worse than no list at all.
On demand: the one that resonates most is "tell me what actually needs me right now and make sure I'm not dropping anything." Founders and execs don't want a smarter search box, they want to stop waking up wondering what fell through the cracks overnight. The "does itself" part is what people get excited about, but the trust comes from the filtering underneath it.
the AI chief of staff category is interesting because the value proposition depends almost entirely on how well it learns how your company actually works versus how companies generically work. a chief of staff who joined last week is less useful than one who's been there two years. what does the learning curve look like for Bond and at what point does it have enough context to be genuinely useful rather than just organized. is there a setup process or does it learn passively from tool connections
just tried. awesome
This looks great, but even a 10 minute free trial would enable me to asses if this could make a significant difference. $199 to find out is a big commitment!
the task-aging-as-signal framing is genuinely smart - most apps just guilt-trip you as things get older, bond actually asking 'does this still matter?' is a way better model. the morning state-reconstruction grind is so real, spending 45 mins bouncing between slack and email just to figure out what to work on is exhausting. trying this
A regular reviewer of the PH emails & new tools. This is the first where I have trawled the comments and your site...really piqued my interest! Congrats on the launch.
Potentially approaching this with a a few 'different hats' & different emails for different orgs. Can all emails be implemented into 1 (Bond gets a full view on me personally), or is it a separate 'tab' for the 3 different businesses essentially ?
Also, is there an opportunity for questions if I proceed with sign up?
Finally, one 'business / opportunity ' close to fruition in the next month or so....can I hold the BETA price until good to go...?😉
Very interesting! Are there options for zero-data retention or ensuring sensitive executive communications are completely omitted from the vector search embedding?
The 'reconstructing the state of your business before making decisions' problem is real. I see the same pattern from the other direction working with owner-led SMBs. The bottleneck is usually the owner, not the tools. Curious how Bond handles businesses where context lives in the owner's head rather than in Slack or a CRM. That's where most of the signal is buried.