Bond - The AI to-do list that does itself

@fafa_nutifafa Ha, I think I know what you mean. "AI that just does things on its own" usually ends weird, because nobody's accountable for the output.

So Bond doesn't work that way. There's always a human in the loop: you. Bond does the heavy lifting (reading across your tools, spotting what matters, drafting the reply, prepping the meeting), but you stay the one who decides and approves. Think of it less as "AI that does itself" and more as a chief of staff who shows up with the work 90% done and says "here, good to send?"

The autonomy is in the grunt work, not the judgment. You keep the wheel, Bond just makes sure you're never starting from a blank page or missing something.

Does that line up with what you were getting at, or were you poking at something more specific? :)

@pavansethi_ Totally fair! Our goal is to get to 0 friction to test :)
But unlike most AI tools, Bond isn't just sitting there waiting for you to prompt it. It's running in the background 24/7, syncing across your entire stack every minute so you never have to.

Most users save 2+ hours a day, so it pays for itself in the first week. The discounted Beta price is $199/month. That's $6.60/day, cheaper than your morning coffee. ☕

@aronlium Thank you Aron!!

@adamcohenhillel thank you adam!

@abhishek_srivastava_eng Thanks Abhishek, could not agree more 🙏

For your question: Yesss, if the call has a transcript or meeting notes connected, Bond can combine that with the calendar context, pull out the verbal action items, identify owners, and surface them as todos with evidence back to the meeting.

Zoom can summarize a Zoom meeting... but Bond is actively trying to manage the follow-through. So if an action item comes up in a call, then gets discussed later in Slack, then needs an email follow-up, Bond connects those dots and keeps tracking it until it's resolved.

@borrellbr Thank you, Ignacio!
Hardest part so far has been getting from "AI finds tasks" to "AI finds the right tasks." It's easy to create another noisy list. Much harder to reliably understand context, merge duplicates, avoid stale todos, and surface the few things that actually matter today.

The use case with the most demand so far is follow-through: catching the things that slip between email, Slack, meetings, and memory. Unanswered follow-ups, blockers, decisions waiting on someone, draft replies, delegation nudges, aka the operational loose ends that executives and chiefs of staff spend all day chasing.

That's why we like this framing, the real value isn't storing tasks, it's clearing as many of them as possible. What usecase did you have in mind for Bond?

@borrellbr Thanks! Easily the hardest part: signal-to-noise. It's deceptively easy to build something that connects to all your tools and then proudly dumps everything back at you. A lot of what's out there does exactly that, and it just becomes another firehose with an AI label slapped on. Genuinely deciding "this matters to you, this doesn't" is brutally hard, and it's where we've spent the most blood. A list you can't trust is worse than no list at all.

On demand: the one that resonates most is "tell me what actually needs me right now and make sure I'm not dropping anything." Founders and execs don't want a smarter search box, they want to stop waking up wondering what fell through the cracks overnight. The "does itself" part is what people get excited about, but the trust comes from the filtering underneath it.