Choose Code Hunter Personal when one person owns the review: an independent developer, consultant, researcher, or auditor who wants to review a project, validate findings, produce a report, and hand off focused fixes.
Choose Code Hunter Team when security work is shared across people or repeated across releases. Team is designed for organizations that need a common baseline, owner assignment, remediation tracking, dependency review, CI evidence, and release gates.
A simple rule helps: if the question is What is in this project, and what should I fix? , start with Personal. If the question is Who owns this risk, what changed since the last iteration, and is this release ready? , choose Team.
Personal is the focused starting point. Team becomes valuable when coordination, accountability, and repeatable release decisions matter.

Code Hunter helps people turn security findings into work they can understand and finish.
For an individual developer or auditor, it brings a project into one reviewable workspace. You can prepare a project, choose review settings, inspect findings in context, decide what matters, export a report, and create a focused fix package for handoff.
For a team, Code Hunter adds the shared operating rhythm that a one-off scan cannot provide. Teams can establish a baseline, compare later iterations, assign owners, track remediation, review software dependencies, connect CI evidence, and preserve the decision behind a release.
The value is practical: less time sorting through disconnected alerts, clearer ownership, better conversations between engineering and security, and a record that explains what was found, what was fixed, and why a release was accepted.