Qimin Z.

Code Hunter helps people turn security findings into work they can understand and finish.
For an individual developer or auditor, it brings a project into one reviewable workspace. You can prepare a project, choose review settings, inspect findings in context, decide what matters, export a report, and create a focused fix package for handoff.
For a team, Code Hunter adds the shared operating rhythm that a one-off scan cannot provide. Teams can establish a baseline, compare later iterations, assign owners, track remediation, review software dependencies, connect CI evidence, and preserve the decision behind a release.
The value is practical: less time sorting through disconnected alerts, clearer ownership, better conversations between engineering and security, and a record that explains what was found, what was fixed, and why a release was accepted.

Choose Code Hunter Personal when one person owns the review: an independent developer, consultant, researcher, or auditor who wants to review a project, validate findings, produce a report, and hand off focused fixes.
Choose Code Hunter Team when security work is shared across people or repeated across releases. Team is designed for organizations that need a common baseline, owner assignment, remediation tracking, dependency review, CI evidence, and release gates.
A simple rule helps: if the question is What is in this project, and what should I fix? , start with Personal. If the question is Who owns this risk, what changed since the last iteration, and is this release ready? , choose Team.
Personal is the focused starting point. Team becomes valuable when coordination, accountability, and repeatable release decisions matter.