Would your office buy an AI appliance it owns outright?
Founder here. ANVE is a private AI appliance for offices whose work cannot go to a cloud model: law and CA firms, clinics, colleges, district offices, India first. One box on the office network, many named users through a browser, meetings to minutes, documents, search and answers over the office's own records. No API keys, no per-token bills.
Where we honestly are: the software runs on an off-the-shelf Ryzen AI mini-PC and has been used in one real working setting. No sealed unit yet; every image on the page is a labelled render. No customers. We priced the product from the bill of materials before tooling and published the result, including three tiers that were below cost and a claim we had to retract (anveai.com/notes).
We launch here on Tuesday 29 September. Four questions I would rather hear answers to before that than after:
If you run or advise a small firm that refuses cloud AI for client work, what is the actual reason: policy, regulator, client contract, or trust? What would change your mind about a box on the premises?
2. Is a one-time price (published target about Rs 95,000, roughly US$1,000 for the entry tier) with no subscription a feature, or does it make the product look unsupported?
3. "Why not a Mac Studio with Ollama?" We wrote a whole note on that. Tell me where it is wrong.
4. What would make you distrust a hardware startup taking refundable reservations (Rs 999 / US$12) before a prototype exists?
Blunt answers welcome. I will reply to every one.
Replies