... what really matters. But the reality behind the curtain leaves a bad taste in my mouth. As a ghostwriter and bookworm, I keep returning to: authors spending years crafting something unique, only to see it ingested into LLMs withoutpermission, credit, or compensation; books being regularly destroyed just for the sake of AI training; the endless sprint to release the next dominant model, pushing safety and accuracy into an afterthought. And these are just some of the things we keep ...

... powered art protection platform built specifically for digital creators. The problem it solves is one most artists don't even know is happening to them their work is being scraped, ingested by AI models, and used for training withoutpermission, payment, or notice. Every single day. I'm not a big studio. I'm not backed by a VC. I'm just someone who got angry enough about what's happening to artists in the AI era to actually ...

... filmmaker, that's a signal that renews my confidence in physical production. Hollywood isn't afraid of new tools. It's refusing to lose consent. Studios can chase billion dollar video models. But if the work is trained withoutpermission and pushed

... Proxy networks to bypass regional restrictions Targeted extraction of reasoning, coding and tool-use abilities Distillation is a common technique for training smaller models from larger ones. The controversy here is using a competitor s model outputs at scale without

... logically object. That s what brought me here. Validation? I prefer delusional confidence , thank you. But seriously I love building products for real humans, especially when they re messy, misunderstood, and drowning in info overload. If you re: Building withoutpermission Too early for the market (but still right) Powered by caffeine, chaos, and GPUs drop a comment so we can suffer and succeed together Also what s the most ridiculous idea you ve launched

... visible and what now for the original artist? Whether someone wants to share open source code or create free licensed music is a choice. It is not a choice for someone to profit from someone else's work withoutpermission. We have a term for it it is called theft. (In politics, we would call it Illegal privatization) And if we want to pretend that no one should have any rights to anything, then let s agree that these ... ... somewhere, and especially in our times, where information is simply more important than food (metaphorically speaking) having IP laws does not serve anyone. IP laws however or a better version of them, should exist for startups, bootstrappers and people