... tools we simply can t imagine our day without. If I had to pick a few AI tools that have become part of my daily workflow, these would be: ChatGPT + Claude summarising and improving text (and Codex in VS Code for coding) Grammarly AI correcting and improving my English Figma with its AI prompting helps me a lot with improving my graphic design ideas Google Gemini for note-taking from Google Meet, plus AI features in Google Sheets and Docs ... ... that remove a category of attention, not just summarize it afterward. Claude Code is one. Good meeting capture is another, but only when it turns a call into decisions and next steps instead of a long transcript. While building OsmO

... answers here are attacking the evidence axis, so let me push on the other half of your question - what would still stop me enabling it. I build a consumer product where people forward their actual phone calls to it (OsmO), so the ask is arguably more invasive than a keyboard. Two things surprised me running that gauntlet. First: almost nobody verifies. Not "few" - close to zero. We published the evidence and watched the click-through. It is still worth publishing ...

... everyone, I'm the founder of OsmO. Quick story on why I'm here: I kept missing calls that actually mattered (a callback from a clinic, a client trying to reach me) because they were buried under spam and robocalls I'd long stopped answering. The habit of just letting it ring was quietly costing me real things. So we built OsmO

... user___1702026e6f946759d1d798a): This is also one of the first things investors look for. A polished demo can attract attention, but if someone cannot quickly understand who has the problem, how painful it is, and why the current alternatives are inadequate, the conversation hits a dead end. Based on my own experience and a friend who works at 1752vc, the strongest pitches often make the problem feel inevitable before they spend much time explaining the product. Comment from Martin Tanner ... ... that's a very important distinction. That could also explain why you're attracting more men, who are looking for a real solution vs

... genuinely love to walk through this if you're open to it, feels like the kind of framework that could reshape how AI strategists get evaluated moving forward. Comment from Anuj(@getosmo): Made a version of this jump building OsmO went from 'ship the feature' to 'get a real person to actually change how they use their phone.' What blindsided me: as an IC, correct is the scoreboard. The moment you own adoption, the scoreboard quietly becomes 'did the human ... ... turns out to be translation: saying one idea in each stakeholder's own words and fears. Nobody warned me how much of it is emotional, not technical. Comment from Nolan Vu(@nolan_vu): @getosmo  Thanks Anuj, the OsmO