... Reflect @LM Studio Discord Comment from Thomas.(@tedavis): @busmark_w_nika  Had to be done! Comment from Thomas.(@tedavis): Recently it's been: Ferguson (my own landing page auditor, it's been insightful auditing so many landing pages!) VSCode - for a few different side projects Claude - sense checking and sounding board Product Hunt - Inspiration Notes - have to log all those ideas somewhere! Comment from Yaser Alosefer(@alosefer): My five are a mix of development, infrastructure, security, and automation ... ... Claude Code: for exploring large codebases, reviewing architecture, debugging difficult issues, and automating repetitive engineering work. 2. Cloudflare: for DNS, application security, traffic protection, caching, and managing services at the edge. 3. VS

... previous step. 3. **Data Privacy**: Reluctance to upload proprietary codebase directories or idea drafts to external databases. That s why I built SoloMap: a **local-first AI roadmap and agent task coordinator** that lives entirely inside VS Code. ### How it works: 1. **Initialize**: Run the extension, choose a project folder, and SoloMap creates a starter roadmap node. 2. **Generate & Refine**: Let your local agent CLI (like Antigravity `agy`, Claude Code, or Codex) modify and write the real `roadmap.csv ... ... your folder. 3. **Execute**: Expand any roadmap node to launch a dedicated conversation in VS

... everyone While working with Claude Code in VS Code , I ran into a small but frustrating workflow issue. For months I ve been using Antigravity , which allows you to select code and press Ctrl + L to instantly send that snippet as context to the agent. Even better, you can repeat this multiple times in the same message, and the UI provides context chips that let you trace the referenced code easily. However, when I started using the Claude Code VS

... schema 71% 19% Cite data sources 68% 27% Part 3: What content wins AI citations? This is the question everyone asks. Here's the data: Top 5 content types by citation rate: Comparison pages (X vs Y) 3.2x average Structured FAQs 2.8x average Data-driven articles (with stats, tables, studies) 2.4x average "How to" guides (step-by-step) 1.9x average Original research 1.7x average What performs poorly: Short opinion pieces Thin content (<500 words ... ... great for blue links. But none of them show you how you appear in AI answers. Here's what we track: Actual AI-generated answers mentioning your brand Citation rates across ChatGPT, Google SGE, Perplexity, Gemini Share of voice vs

... like an actual assistant, other times you can definitely tell it s AI. Cons Aggressive onboarding bouncer can be off-putting for some. Pricing is inconsistent (some get in for $3, others pay $30), which can frustrate users. Some integrations/tools can be slow. Still early days, so you might encounter occasional bugs and rough edges. Design & Build Poke s main interface is one you re most likely familiar with: your messaging platform of choice. You can choose from ... ... wait for you to open it or prompt it ... it just does it. It really does feel like you have an assistant texting you about your meetings, plans, and updates. Performance is generally smooth, though some third-party integrations/MPCs

... Been checking out Cursor, an AI code editor that deeply integrates AI into your workflow. Think natural language coding, smart predictions, and asking your codebase questions. It's trying to push AI further than, say, VS Code (even with Copilot). I'm curious: How has Cursor's AI experience been for you compared to your current setup? Does a dedicated AI-first editor like this feel like a significant leap? Let's discuss! Comment from Abe Qarm(@abe_qarm): interesting ...