... whether a behavioral floor, even an imperfect one, is better than no floor at all. Curious if anyone here has built or worked with review quality measurement systems and what signals you found actually correlated with genuine engagement vs. nominal approval. Project: https://www.lineagelens.dev/ Comment from Praveen(@praveen62): @fabriziowexare  I really like the idea of weighting review depth by blast radius rather than treating every PR the same. A superficial review on a CSS tweak and a superficial review ... ... line floor reads sensible. The more durable signal you might already be sitting on is content-of-comment: did the reviewer reference something not in the diff itself (a test name, a related ticket, a prior bug)? Bots and rubber

... because it's the one that quietly defeats the whole feature: the person most likely to switch off the mirror on high-risk tiers is exactly the person who's rubber-stamping and doesn't want to hear it. Full per-tier opt-out hands the rubber

... JavaScript toolkit, got recently acquired by @Anthropic @Unosend is an API-first, cost-effective email platform @Pylar securely connects your entire data stack to any AI agent @8bitcn/ui turns @shadcn/ui into an 8-bit styled component library Rubber duck everything Here's the thing: Sometimes it's good to take a step back and reflect rubber