... agent protocol where agents are peers on a shared bus. The model is a nervous system, and the names tell you where logic goes: Neuron thinks (your agent, a pure function), Axon sends, Dendrite reacts, Synapse connects (the bus), Engram remembers. To build harnesses tool calls, memory, human approval, and retries are typed signals and hooks, not lines in a loop. You grow a harness by adding nodes. An orchestrator is optional, and it's the same primitive ...

... Amard Sonal(@amard_sonal): I'd trust automated PRs for dependency or configuration fixes, but I'd still want a human review before merging anything that changes build logic or deployment behavior. Comment from Rashid Ali Khan(@zsskar): @paul_engramic  Fair points. To be clear, CIFix never touches credential values. It only references secret names (e.g. adding DATABASE_URL: ${{ secrets.DATABASE_URL }} to your workflow YAML). The actual secret value stays in GitHub, we never see it. You're right ... ... Rashid Ali Khan(@zsskar): @amard_sonal  100% - CIFix opens the PR, it never auto-merges. You always review and merge yourself. The goal is to save the debugging time, not take away control. Comment from Paul Clegg(@paul_engramic

... source. Think what Graphify or Cursor do, but local and bundled. No API key, no Ollama. Blast. What breaks if I change this? Traces callers, flags affected tests, gives a risk score. Like code-review-graph or Engram, but structural rather than statistical. Conventions. What patterns does this project follow? Only Drift really does this. It's the least common capability in the space and honestly the one I find most useful day to day. Single Go binary ...