... people will keep using them. I believe the winners will be technologies that remove work from people s lives, not just add another device to manage. Comment from g023 - Developer(@g023): Closed source AI. I can see the ivory castles crumbling already. I remember back in the day when they said ASP would continue to rule into the future, and I looked at, what was janky at the time, PHP and said "I don't think so". Then ... ... surface is what dies. And that distinction has teeth commercially: the moment your product becomes infrastructure someone else operates, you usually lose the customer relationship the agent owns the user now, you're just a backend it picks. 'Visible vs

... without being sent somewhere else. Here's the part that keeps me up at night though: my AI co-founder has seen every line of code, every business decision, every pivot. It essentially has the keys to the castle. And I don't fully understand how it makes every decision it makes. That's terrifying and exhilarating at the same time. So I've got three genuine questions for this community: For anyone who's built a product with ... ... that would keep me up too. What has helped me with a similar problem is not trying to make the system always right, it is making it grade its own confidence and say plainly when it is guessing versus

... just another AI tool; it's an upgrade for your AI . It turns your simple, everyday language into the rich, detailed prompts that AI models crave. See the difference for yourself: BEFORE Promptis (your idea) : a castle in a forest (You get a generic, boring image or description/response). AFTER Promptis (1-Click Enhancement) : Illustrate a majestic, medieval-style castle