... arithmetic, so when you tell a hiring manager why someone didn't make the shortlist you have something to point at rather than a number the tool refuses to explain. It's early, real recruiters are using it and breaking it in ways I didn't predict, which is exactly what I need right now. Link is in my profile if you want to run a real role through it and tell me where it falls apart ...

... prompt is often something like: Is this a good startup idea? The problem is that this produces one big conclusion from a bunch of smaller assumptions. So I changed the workflow. Instead of asking AI for a verdict, I break the idea into separate questions: Problem Who actually experiences it? How often does it happen? What happens if they do nothing? Current solution What are people doing today? Is the workaround free, manual, or already good enough? Business Who pays ... ... needs to help you understand what the decision actually depends on. I'm curious whether other founders use a similar approach, or whether you still prefer getting one overall assessment of an idea. Comment from Hossein Yazdi(@hosseinyazdi): Breaking

... building Repairo. It's essentially Dependabot, but for fixing breaking API changes instead of just bumping lockfiles. Currently, when a vendor like Stripe or OpenAI updates their API spec, Dependabot bumps the version. But then your build fails, and you have to manually hunt down call-sites to refactor your code. Repairo automates the code rewrite. Instead of letting an LLM guess fixes (which introduces hallucinations and security risks), we built a hybrid engine: - Local AST parser: Uses ts-morph ...

... touch one file and have no real sense of what else depends on it until CI (or prod) tells me. Ended up manually tracing imports before merging anything non-trivial, just to make sure I'm not breaking something three files away. Anyone else running into this, especially with AI-assisted code? Curious if it's a real pattern or just me being paranoid. Comment from Ece(@ecekc): I agree with you. AI-assisted coding definitely makes things easier ... ... suite for shared or foundational code. Import tracing helps, but it won t catch every behavioral dependency. Maybe the rule should be: AI can write fast, but it shouldn t merge until it can explain what the change might break

... website. Personally, I wouldn t use Product Hunt only to validate an idea or a problem anymore. I would feel ready to launch once I reached these points: the product works with its core features (it doesn't break) it has been properly tested by developers, UX/UI testers, and a few potential users (with bugs fixed) it has its own landing page explaining the product it already has a version with payments integrated it follows Product Hunt s launch ... ... novic, somehow unique; they also do not feature courses, directories, etc. Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @ankushkun  Can you remind me on the launch day? :) Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @konstantin_tikhaev  Wait! Did anything break

... less capable. Because the product has absorbed too many decisions that no one remembers making. That is when decisions start getting made with partial context. That is when the product becomes fragile. That is when fixing one thing breaks three others. Here is what that feels like. You add a new feature. It works in staging. It breaks

... agent writes the code who s actually testing it? Do you still go through edge cases and user scenarios manually, or are you also delegating please break my app to another agent now? Has testing become more systematic and automated in your workflow, or you just moving faster with fewer guardrails (and let users break

... both content and   product work.   2. Google Search Console I basically live in it. For anything SEO, it's the only honest source of truth   about what's actually happening vs. what I assume is happening.   3. Ahrefs keyword and competitor

... question, because it decides how gameable the whole thing is: how does an artifact keep its identity across surfaces in your mapping, content fingerprinting, explicit links, or a human declaring "this is that"? Fingerprints break on heavy edits, links break

... from day one. That can be wasteful and prevent you from finding product-market fit. The most cost-effective investment is made before writing the first line of code: spend two weeks on architecture. Scale mindset: Ask "what will break at 10,000 users?" not "can it run with 100 users." Automated testing from day one: If you cannot "click a button to confirm nothing else is broken," every deployment is a gamble . Boring technology stack: React, Node, Postgres ... ... being an excellent chef but never having managed a restaurant kitchen during the dinner rush . What I am curious about When did you last look at your database indexes? Do you have automated tests? And where will your system break

... product discovery changes as teams grow. At small scale it s fast and intuitive, but at larger scale it often becomes fragmented, slow, or disconnected from the actual system. From your experience-what s the first thing that breaks in discovery workflows when teams scale? Comment from Maya Elor(@maya_elor): @sunshinemiller  Totally agree, the drift from real user signals is exactly what we keep seeing. What s interesting is that it s rarely just a data problem ... ... trying to keep it continuous so it evolves with the product as teams scale, instead of relying on that initial snapshot. Comment from Stan Kolotinskiy(@sk_uxpin): From a developer's perspective, the first thing I notice breaking

... found 2 potential bugs and fixed them. We started feeling safe again. Then at 3am, our site went down. Claude had updated a core dependency to the latest version. It worked in test. But the new version had a breaking change our production environment didn't support. No human would have made that mistake. Day 6: The blame game. We spent the morning restoring the site. Asked Claude what happened. It explained the dependency logic perfectly. It acknowledged the mistake ... ... review the logic and have it review the implementation before anything gets merged. Two things that I do almost every time that has significantly improved the quality is to have the agent do a gap analysis of the plan vs

... Figma plugin for testing multilingual UI earlier in the design workflow. The focus is simple: help teams see whether a screen still works after translation, especially when layout, mixed-language content, and UI consistency start to break down. The idea behind it is the same one that keeps me building it: your design should hold up in every language. If you re building a product, you re already building for a global market. Would love feedback from anyone working ... ... treating text in isolation. Context-aware within each screen Labels, actions, and values are interpreted more accurately in their UI context. More reliable translations Fewer subtle mistranslations especially for short or ambiguous UI text. Better layout fit without breaking

... Hello forks, I'm excited to announce that MBCompass v1.1.9 gonna release this week with breaking changes and improvements like: New features: Implemented the Settings screen for setting preferences, like changing themes, about pages, and more coming soon. Added Sensor status state on the top app bar with an alert dialog to notify of the compass accuracy changes, with instructions to calibrate it. Existing fixes (Improvements): Map Current Location arrow poor visibility with new custom icons. Added the current location ...

... doing so felt wrong on a human level because we were motivated by the idea of going on a fun, ambitious journey together. But it also felt illogical on a strategic level. Most startups fail because the cofounders break up more so than failing to find  product-market fit . (source = I made it up, but it s extremely common and often business problems can be traced back to dysfunction at the top) Therefore, I d argue you should just ... ... minimize the risk of you and your cofounder breaking