Launching today
Relevyn
Track and fix how AI describes your brand
10 followers
Track and fix how AI describes your brand
10 followers
Buyers now ask ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini for recommendations before they Google you -- and most brands have no idea what those engines say back. Relevyn scans all four, scores your AI visibility 0-100, and shows you where you're invisible. Then it writes the content to fix it -- drafts, not just a dashboard. Track your score over time and see which competitors own the answers you don't. For founders and marketers who'd rather be the recommendation.
Hey Product Hunt, I'm Tabor -- co-founder of Relevyn.
I built this because I kept watching the same shift happen over the years as AI became increasingly popular. People stopped Googling and started asking ChatGPT instead. I watched this happen in real time from the release of ChatGPT all the way to where we are now -- and whatever the model said became the shortlist. If your brand isn't in the answer, you don't get a second chance to make your case. You're just not in the room.
The problem is you can't fix what you can't see. So Relevyn runs your brand through ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, scores how visible you actually are (0-100), and surfaces the exact prompts where competitors get recommended and you don't. The part I care most about is it doesn't stop at a dashboard. Most AI-visibility tools hand you a score and shrug, or cost $100(s)/mo. Relevyn writes the actual content -- publishable drafts -- built to get you mentioned, then tracks whether your score moves.
Two things I'd value from this community:
1. Run a free scan on your own brand and drop your score below -- I'll read every one and tell you the single highest-leverage fix I see.
2. Tell me where it falls short. I want the uncomfortable feedback, not the polite kind.
ProductHunt-exclusive: extended 30-day trial (link in reply). Curious -- have you actually checked what ChatGPT says about your company yet? the first scan is usually a surprise.
Free 30-day trial --> Relevyn Pro
@taborbachelor Hi :) Quick question about the score. It looks like it came from one ChatGPT prompt that did not mention my brand, which I expected for such a new site - so I am curious how that works out to 25/100. If the query returned nothing, what do the 25 points represent? Just trying to understand what the score is measuring.
@alieksia Hi! Great question. The free front-page audit checks ChatGPT only, and for your brand it came back with no mention — so on the thing it measured, you're at zero. The 25 isn't ChatGPT "sort of" mentioning you; it's a baseline floor in the free audit, which honestly is more of a rough signal than a precise score. The full product scores across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini and separates them out, so you'd see a real per-engine picture instead of one number. But your read is correct — for ChatGPT specifically, you're currently invisible, and that's the thing worth fixing.
@taborbachelor Thank you for the honest answer :) Good to know the 25 is just a baseline - showing 0 or labelling it clearly might build more trust than a number that does not mean much. Being invisible is what I am working on right now anyway, so I will keep at it. Good luck with the tool!
@alieksia Thank you for trying Relevyn! Always looking for the areas where we need to improve.
Congrats on the launch! 🚀
AI visibility is becoming a real problem. A lot of brands still track Google rankings, but they have no idea how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Gemini describe them.
I like that Relevyn goes beyond scoring and creates draft content to improve visibility. Curious how you measure whether a content change actually influenced the AI answers over time, since model responses can vary between runs.
@prashant_patil14 Thank you! I realized that as I grew up with AI I watched my friends and people around me start to use it as a search engine as opposed to Google, and 9/10 times they blindly followed what AI said.
On measurement: a single scan is noisy, so we never trust one. We track your appearance rate over time - across many runs and engines - and give each query it's own noise floor, so a shift only counts when it clears that query's natural variance. For content, we compare all the runs before you published against all the runs after and show the delta.
I will say that models take time to pick up new content and visibility moves for lots of reasons, so we frame it as directional, not proof of causation. The trend over many runs is what makes it trustworthy - not any single before/after.
Track the trend, not the score.
Ran my own brand through it and the visibility score was honestly lower than I expected across all four engines. The competitor gap view is where it clicked for me, finally saw which pages were getting cited instead of mine.
@eydabacanagasw Really appreciate you actually running it! And honestly, the "lower than expected" part is the whole reason we built this - most brands assume they're showing up in AI answers and have no idea there's a gap until they see it in black and white. Better to know now.
That's exactly the moment the competitor gap view is meant to create - seeing which pages are getting cited instead of yours turn a vague "we should do AI stuff" into a specific target list. From there, Fix This Week takes those gaps and hands you the actual content to close them, and you can watch the appearance rate climb as the engines pick it up.
If you end up publishing one of those gaps, I'd love to hear whether it moves and what we can do @ Relevyn to help! The feedback loop is the part I can most about getting right.