⏰ This product is a draft and is not scheduled for a launch yet.
Most B2B data providers force a tradeoff between coverage and volume. QuickEnrich gives you both: unlimited data on month-to-month plans, no annual contracts, and 30–50% higher coverage by reaching SMBs other databases miss. Its API runs in real-time workflows, AI agents, waterfalls, and customer-facing tools—and plugs directly into Claude Code, Clay, Codex, or your own pipeline.
I'm Tom Blue and today we're launching QuickEnrich, unlimited B2B data with expanded coverage, fresh, with an API fast enough to run in real time workflows.
Here's how we got here. Over the past year, three groups kept coming to my other company, Lead411, with the same asks: GTM engineers, AI agent builders, and even other data platforms. They wanted three things nobody was really giving them:
1. Better coverage on SMBs — especially the ones without a real LinkedIn presence, where most providers just don't have data.
2. Unlimited access, month-to-month. No one wanted to lock into a year-long contract just to get enough volume.
3. A genuinely fast API — something they could drop into a waterfall or serve to their own customers without slowing anything down.
When Gen AI hit, I kept wondering how it would change the sales data business. It took watching the landscape shift — Clay, n8n, Claude Code, and everything built on top of them — to see it clearly: the appetite for B2B data has exploded, and people just want a fast, simple way to get it into the tools they're already using.
That's QuickEnrich. Drop it into Claude Code, Codex, Clay or your own code and you've got unlimited access to one of the best-covered B2B databases out there.
The thing we hear most from early users: "I'm not missing 40% of my ICP anymore." That's really what this is for — not just saving money, but finally reaching the market you're actually trying to reach.
Would love to hear what you think, and happy to answer anything about the data, the API, or why we priced it this way.
If you've tried enriching SMB data before - what broke? Stale records, just no coverage at all? Trying to figure out if we're solving the whole problem or just part of it.