Launching today
Patchrooms
Turn AI-app feedback into agent-ready patch context.
56 followers
Turn AI-app feedback into agent-ready patch context.
56 followers
Drop one script into any AI-built preview. Reviewers point at elements and leave text, screenshots, or voice notes. Patchrooms captures URL, viewport, browser, console errors, and element context, then turns feedback into agent-ready markdown or MCP reports for Claude Code, Cursor, and other coding agents. Not tickets — patch context.
Closing the review-to-fix loop to match the build loop is exactly the gap I feel right now. Pasting "this button feels off" into Claude Code never carries enough context. When a reviewer points at an element, does it grab a stable selector so the patch still lands after the next rebuild?
@ianhxu
Honestly, the anchor I lean on isn't a CSS selector — it's the selected text plus the URL. When a reviewer highlights the thing they mean, the report carries that exact text and the page URL, and that's usually enough for the agent to find the component: the URL tells it which page/area, the text pins the element. We do attach a best-effort CSS selector too, but I treat it as a hint, not the source of truth — a positional selector drifts exactly when you'd expect, on a big regeneration, so I won't oversell it. For rebuild-proof anchoring I think the honest answer is explicit, not inferred. I'm building a small declarative library that tags components with stable, semantic data attributes — you locate by meaning ({component, name, label}), not by DOM path, so the anchor survives any regen by design. I built the same idea in a previous product, and the nice side effect is it doubles as your e2e/Playwright locators — one tag, used by both reviewers and tests. Happy to ping you when it's out. How are you handling it today — adding test ids, or letting the agent re-find from context?