Most AI teams pick a model first and discover the bill later. We built Oxlo.ai to change that. Access 35+ frontier AI models including DeepSeek V4 Pro, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5, Qwen, Llama, and Mistral through a single API. Compare models, calibrate responses, and choose the right model for each use case. Scale across AI models with predictable monthly subscriptions, benchmark-grade performance, generous usage limits, and we never train on your data.
Hey guys! Only 1.5 hours left, and we re currently competing for the #1 rank. Would really appreciate a little support from your side to help us reach the top.
Thanks a lot for all the love and support! https://www.producthunt.com/prod...
The API angle is useful, but the boring hard part is usually auth edge cases and retries. Curious if Oxlo generates tests/error handling too, or starts with happy-path connectors first?
Report
If the pitch is scaling across models without scaling the bill, the obvious question is what Oxlo's margin looks like on the heaviest usage tiers, are you negotiating better rates with the underlying model providers at volume, or is the "predictable" pricing actually subsidized early on and likely to change once usage patterns stabilize?
Congrats on the launch! Predictable pricing is a refreshing approach. With OpenRouter, Together AI, and other model gateways already in the market, what has been the biggest reason customers choose Oxlo.ai instead of existing providers?
Report
Congrats on the launch. Request-based pricing is a really interesting way to charge. But what if someone requests a large batch of work? How do you prevent someone from submitting a single request with a large batch of work to game the flat rate?
Report
Looks promising! Tested the Kimi integration—works as expected. My only concern is latency under throttling; it’s slightly higher than raw API calls, but the convenience of unified billing might be worth the trade-off for us. Curious to see how the privacy stack evolves. Good luck today!
The API angle is useful, but the boring hard part is usually auth edge cases and retries. Curious if Oxlo generates tests/error handling too, or starts with happy-path connectors first?
If the pitch is scaling across models without scaling the bill, the obvious question is what Oxlo's margin looks like on the heaviest usage tiers, are you negotiating better rates with the underlying model providers at volume, or is the "predictable" pricing actually subsidized early on and likely to change once usage patterns stabilize?
Congrats on the launch. Request-based pricing is a really interesting way to charge. But what if someone requests a large batch of work? How do you prevent someone from submitting a single request with a large batch of work to game the flat rate?
Looks promising! Tested the Kimi integration—works as expected. My only concern is latency under throttling; it’s slightly higher than raw API calls, but the convenience of unified billing might be worth the trade-off for us. Curious to see how the privacy stack evolves. Good luck today!
Do you normalize responses across providers, or do developers still have to handle each model?
This is really wonderful. But how can you have predictable pricing? Do you limit the user upon reaching a certain threshold?