LLMagnet gives WordPress sites an AI visibility layer. Track visits from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and other AI crawlers, measure your AI Visibility Score, generate llms.txt and structured data, and make your site readable and actionable for AI agents.
@ido_navarro1@bencohen congrats on the launch!!!! 👏 the thing I'd most want to know is the gap between crawled and cited - which pages AI bots read constantly and still never surface in an answer. That's the gap that nothing really shows today. plus // didn't expect the MCP connector; pulling the visibility data into Claude directly instead of exporting dashboards is a nice touch. onwards!! you rock.
@ido_navarro1@galrubinx Hey buddy! Fair point, being crawled doesn’t mean you’re actually getting cited. We can show what bots access today, but connecting that to actual citations is still a gap. Glad you noticed the MCP connector too! Appreciate you showing up for us 🙌
Report
Love the timing on this launch. A lot of marketers I know still talk about ChatGPT like it’s magic, almost nobody talks about whether the site is even readable to these systems.
For makers here: what’s the first “wait, AI is already on my site?” moment you’ve had, if any?
@guy_karolizki Thanks Guy! :) We spend hours moving a button three pixels to the left, then forget to check if a crawler can even read what we’re selling 😅 that’s the part I want to make easier for site owners. Before 'does ChatGPT recommend us?'..let’s see what it can actually access.
genuinely curious about the "AI Visibility Score" - is that measuring something you can verify against real crawler logs, or is it more of a heuristic/composite number? the risk with any new "score" product is it becomes a vanity metric people chase without it actually correlating to whether ChatGPT or Claude surfaces their site in an answer. how do you validate that the score moving up actually means more real AI referrals, not just better llms.txt hygiene?
@galdayan Good question - and you’re right to be wary of vanity scores.
Our Visibility Score is a readiness / hygiene checklist for AI access and understanding (structure, page health, content clarity, etc.). It is NOT “will ChatGPT or Claude cite you,” and it is NOT validated against AI referrals. Crawler activity is tracked separately from the score.
So a higher score means the site is in better shape for models to read - not that referrals went up. If that distinction isn’t clear in the product, that’s on us to fix.
@ido_navarro1 appreciate the straight answer, especially the "that's on us to fix" part rather than defending the current copy. separating crawler tracking from the score itself seems like the right call architecturally - would just make that split visible in the dashboard UI itself, not only in a comment thread, since most users won't ask the question I did.
We’ve been using LLMagnet for a while now and it’s become a really useful part of how we look at AI visibility on our WordPress site. Simple, clear, and actually gives us insights we can act on. Congrats on the launch
@katzomri Thanks, Omri! Glad it’s become part of how you approach AI visibility on the site. What was the first actionable insight for you? A bot you didn’t expect, or a money page that barely got hit?
@katzomri Thanks, Omri! Really glad the insights are helping you make changes on your site. Appreciate you using LLMagnet and taking the time to support the launch 🙌
Report
Congrats on the launch!! this is exactly the blind spot I’m feeling.
my site is on Webflow, not WordPress. Is there a way for non-WP sites to see the same data or is this WP-only for now? If there’s a workaround you’d recommend in the meantime?
The shift from SEO to AI visibility is honestly pretty interesting. Being able to see how AI bots interact with your site is something most website owners probably don’t even think about yet. Congrats on the launch!
@suryansh_tiwari2 Thanks Suryansh! Website owners already have enough dashboards to babysit :) We wanted to bring this into WordPress so they can see which crawlers are visiting and figure out what needs attention while working on their site. Appreciate the support!
Unboxable
@ido_navarro1 @bencohen congrats on the launch!!!! 👏 the thing I'd most want to know is the gap between crawled and cited - which pages AI bots read constantly and still never surface in an answer. That's the gap that nothing really shows today. plus // didn't expect the MCP connector; pulling the visibility data into Claude directly instead of exporting dashboards is a nice touch. onwards!! you rock.
LLMagnet
@ido_navarro1 @galrubinx Hey buddy! Fair point, being crawled doesn’t mean you’re actually getting cited. We can show what bots access today, but connecting that to actual citations is still a gap. Glad you noticed the MCP connector too! Appreciate you showing up for us 🙌
Love the timing on this launch. A lot of marketers I know still talk about ChatGPT like it’s magic, almost nobody talks about whether the site is even readable to these systems.
For makers here: what’s the first “wait, AI is already on my site?” moment you’ve had, if any?
LLMagnet
@guy_karolizki Thanks Guy! :) We spend hours moving a button three pixels to the left, then forget to check if a crawler can even read what we’re selling 😅 that’s the part I want to make easier for site owners. Before 'does ChatGPT recommend us?'..let’s see what it can actually access.
Dial
genuinely curious about the "AI Visibility Score" - is that measuring something you can verify against real crawler logs, or is it more of a heuristic/composite number? the risk with any new "score" product is it becomes a vanity metric people chase without it actually correlating to whether ChatGPT or Claude surfaces their site in an answer. how do you validate that the score moving up actually means more real AI referrals, not just better llms.txt hygiene?
LLMagnet
@galdayan Good question - and you’re right to be wary of vanity scores.
Our Visibility Score is a readiness / hygiene checklist for AI access and understanding (structure, page health, content clarity, etc.). It is NOT “will ChatGPT or Claude cite you,” and it is NOT validated against AI referrals. Crawler activity is tracked separately from the score.
So a higher score means the site is in better shape for models to read - not that referrals went up. If that distinction isn’t clear in the product, that’s on us to fix.
Dial
@ido_navarro1 appreciate the straight answer, especially the "that's on us to fix" part rather than defending the current copy. separating crawler tracking from the score itself seems like the right call architecturally - would just make that split visible in the dashboard UI itself, not only in a comment thread, since most users won't ask the question I did.
ABcommerce by Dialogue
We’ve been using LLMagnet for a while now and it’s become a really useful part of how we look at AI visibility on our WordPress site. Simple, clear, and actually gives us insights we can act on. Congrats on the launch
LLMagnet
@katzomri Thanks, Omri! Glad it’s become part of how you approach AI visibility on the site. What was the first actionable insight for you? A bot you didn’t expect, or a money page that barely got hit?
LLMagnet
@katzomri Thanks, Omri! Really glad the insights are helping you make changes on your site. Appreciate you using LLMagnet and taking the time to support the launch 🙌
Congrats on the launch!! this is exactly the blind spot I’m feeling.
my site is on Webflow, not WordPress. Is there a way for non-WP sites to see the same data or is this WP-only for now? If there’s a workaround you’d recommend in the meantime?
EverTutor AI
The shift from SEO to AI visibility is honestly pretty interesting. Being able to see how AI bots interact with your site is something most website owners probably don’t even think about yet. Congrats on the launch!
LLMagnet
@suryansh_tiwari2 Thanks Suryansh! Website owners already have enough dashboards to babysit :) We wanted to bring this into WordPress so they can see which crawlers are visiting and figure out what needs attention while working on their site. Appreciate the support!