Launching today
Kopai
Share your expertise, and let our agents earn for you.
79 followers
Share your expertise, and let our agents earn for you.
79 followers
Kopai turns your expertise into an AI agent you can sell, priced per message instead of per hour. Upload your knowledge, publish in minutes with no code, and let people pay for instant answers instead of booking your calendar. You keep 70% of everything your agent earns. Built-in evaluation testing, encrypted knowledge bases, and multi-agent orchestration mean it's not a prompt wrapper, it's real infrastructure. We handle discovery, billing, and trust so you can focus on what you know.
Kopai
the part I'd want to understand before uploading my own knowledge base: when the agent gives someone a wrong or outdated answer under my name, who's actually on the hook for that, me or Kopai? per-hour consulting has a built-in correction loop, the client pushes back live and I clarify. per-message, the buyer just gets an answer and leaves, so a bad take can sit there generating "instant answers" indefinitely before anyone notices it's stale. is there a review or flagging loop on the expert's side, or does it rely entirely on buyers reporting bad responses after the fact?
Kopai
Hi @galdayan !
This is honestly a really good question. Right now the expert’s on the hook for it, same as if it was their own content.
We do have per-message feedback live (thumbs up/down basically), and it does reach the creator, but it’s not tied to anything you can actually analyze yet — no way to catch “this specific answer is stale” vs just general vibes.
What actually on the roadmap right now: a response confidence score that pops up periodically on responses, feeding into an analytics layer that flags when an agent is underperforming and notifies the creator regularly. If in a case the score drops too low, the agent will get auto unpublished from the marketplace, until the creator fixes it and our evals re score it, and it crosses the threshold. It’s not live yet, but this is actively on our pipeline, before the next release!
Thanks for bringing this out! Would love you pressure test this. More feedback is always welcome!
You can reach out to me as well - swapnanil@usekopai.com
Kopai
One more thing worth mentioning is our Eval layer (which I briefly mentioned earlier) inside of the agent builder, which is currently live. Before any agent goes live (or gets updated), it runs through an evaluation layer that scores it across several dimensions: system prompt quality, behavior/scope adherence, and safety (policy refusals + jailbreak resistance) are always checked, with knowledge base retrieval accuracy and tool-use correctness, when the agent actually has KB or any tools enabled. It's a gate, before any agent goes to the marketplace, without it just being a post-facto monitoring tool. Every time a creator changes their agent (new prompt, new knowledge base doc, config tweak, whatever), it automatically gets re-evaluated before the update is live for buyers. So it's not "publish once and hope", essentially every change re-triggers the check.
@swapnanil_ray that eval-gate answers most of my worry actually, re-triggering on every edit is the right call. one thing I'm still curious about - who sets the "too low" threshold for the auto-unpublish, and is that number visible to the expert before it happens? if it's a black box you'd get experts optimizing for the eval instead of the actual answer quality, which is its own failure mode.
Kopai
@galdayan glad that cleared your worry! The publish gate is live today, and the threshold is 70 out of a full score of 100, its fixed, and not hidden anywhere. It's the same number you'd see in your agent builder, right next to the per dimension breakdown. We've tried to make the eval as transparent as possible.
Auto un-publish (along with confidence score analytics) is the piece that's still in the roadmap, not shipped yet. To your exact worry, yes when it does ship, the number and the reasoning behind it need to be visible to you before anything happens. We'd really not want a creator to be punished with a hidden reasoning behind the score!
For the "optimizing for the eval, not the actual answer" risk, yes that's honestly a glaring problem for any scoring system. We're fighting that by not just showing a blended score, but rather a breakdown across the different dimensions. So, "i'll try to hit 70 by any means", is kinda dealt by "don't have a outright failure in one dimension". Yes, to be fair, it's not a full fix to the risk, but that's where we have landed for now. And I'm really grateful that you brought up evals here, because that has been essentially our primary focus right now, to perfect quality over quantity.
How does the platform generate interest in the public for this expertise knowledge base?
Kopai
@zrk222 So each agent on Kopai is treated as an individual product. Therefore, all the agents listed on Kopai's marketplace has it;s own SEO that the creators can tune and optimise to market their product.
We are also trying a creator led economy, where we are collaborating with creators for them to make agents and reach out to their userbase for visibility. As our product actively let's you earn from your agent, that is an added incentive to share and market our product.
Kopai
Hi everyone,
I am Meghna, one of the co-founders.
Would just like to introduce some of the really cool features we have on Kopai.
We have a custom Gen-UI library that we made. Our chat feature or any agents use it asa part of their answer generations. Do give it a try. It is particularly helpful for data visualisation as well as game visualisation.
You can actively earn from your agent. So please do share with your friends and connections.