Kopai
The Cloud for AI Agents
Start new thread

What are the immediate AI Agents/Tools that you would want that will help you?

by
•

In this time when we use LLM's for basically anything, what AI agents/tools would you want that you would actually pay for?
What are you spending a lot of money on and would probably save a lot of you time if you got the Agent out of box, or if configuration was much easier?

369 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best

Well I'd happily pay for an AI agent that handles follow ups across email, Slack , and linkedin without me having to babysit it. Not just drafting messages, but knowing when to follow up, when to stop , and keeping the context intact. That would save me hours every week.

 I absolutely love the idea. For someone who is trying to run a small business an AI Agent who knows when to follow-up seems absolutely a neccessity.

I am surprised no one talks more about AI for project management. Keeping everyone aligned is harder than writing the code these days.

An AI researcher that compares products using docs, Reddit, GitHub, and real reviews would be incredibly useful. Have you found anything close?

 Not really.
Disclaimer, a little self promotion here but I made a product that would solve this exact problem. Maybe if you are up for it you can go make your own AI agent on (). It has all the connectors, it is no code and you can publish it as well for other people to make it. All under 10 mins.
Do try it out

  That actually sounds pretty close to what I had in mind. I’d be especially curious to see how well it handles messy sources like Reddit and GitHub though, rather than just pulling from clean docs. Might give it a try.

 hey Jeremy, I took the liberty of building an agent on Kopai, by stealing your idea, haha! Check this chat out -

Here's the agent I built -

Tried comparing Linear and Clickup here. Let me know your thoughts! You can try building agents yourself too!

something that handles context better & between sessions, i feel like im always telling agents what to store in markdowns for future agents to reference. There should be some framework for agents to manage context automatically without losing model quality. I know a lot of tools like claude code auto compress at a certain point and store internal markdowns but it can be a bit rough around the edges and i feel like it causes model quality to drop a good bit over time

 Yep, that seems like its exacty what I was thinking of, thanks!

 Glad it helped! Feel free to reach out if you run into anything else while trying it out.

 At kopai, we are actually working quite heavily on context specifically in between sessions. We also have a feature called Chat Orientation which helps users and the agent understand the goals and actions taken and change it if you feel that the agent is drifting.

Would love if you could check out () and give us your review so that we can work on it.

looks really interesting, I understood it as a marketplace of agents that creators can make quickly, give it documentation ect and agent gets a vector db to reference if that sounds correct?. Can you give ur agents different tools aswell?

 Yes. You can give it different tools, websearch , knowledge base(the RAG) and also subagents (Other agents in the marketplace). Every agent needs to go through an eval system before it can be published.When a user chats with your agent it automatically has inbuilt features like GEN UI, Document creation, Image generation(depending on the model chosen) file ingestion(pdf, doc) and also has a memory and context layer inbuilt. each chat has inbuilt chat orientation which helps keep the user and agent towards a similar goal.
Finally the more number of users use your agent, the more you earn from it

What I want isn't more agents, it's fewer places where I still have to double check its work before trusting the output.

 What if you had some kind of guarantee, like an evaluation system that you can trust? Would that help?

I would love an AI that watches how I work for a week and then suggests automations I never thought about. That feels like the next step.

that’s actually a great idea
For me, the AI tools worth paying for are the ones that feel safe to use in real work, not just impressive in demos. That’s why I’m building Verlox: plan first, approval before action, full visibility, and an undo path when something goes wrong. The best agents won’t just be smart, they’ll be accountable.

The one I'd actually pay for: something that closes the loop between AI output and human review, instead of treating a generated result as final.

Most agent tools I've tried are confident about everything same tone whether it nailed the task or quietly guessed wrong. What I want is the opposite: an agent that's explicit about which parts of its output it's sure of and which parts are a best guess, so I know exactly where to spend my own attention instead of re-checking everything or trusting all of it blindly.

Closest I've seen this matter in practice: anything doing structured judgment work grading, categorizing, extracting data from messy input. The moment a tool has to make a call rather than just generate text, "I did this, trust me" stops being good enough. Configuration isn't really the blocker for me; trust calibration is.

Curious whether others are running into the same thing, or if this is specific to the kind of work I do.

Most AI tools still feel like demos to me. I am waiting for something I can trust enough to hand over an entire workflow.

I’m afraid that’s impossible, if that day would even come, you will be cautious because that’s just the way we humans are wired with anything with few to none human supervision

I spend way too much time jumping between Notion, Slack, GitHub, and email. an agent that ties everything together would be amazing.

 you could actually try .
You can make your own agent and connect the connectors. It is no code, and you can publish and use it. You don't need a any infrastructure. Pretty easy to configure.

Do take a look.

12
Next