Framer

AI website builder for professional sites and teams

4.8•258 reviews•

8.4K followers

AI website builder for professional sites and teams

4.8•258 reviews•

8.4K followers

Visit website

Website builders

•

No-code Platforms

•

Content Management Systems

•

No-Code Website Builder

The AI website builder for professional sites. Design with agents, refine on the canvas, and ship with your team.

Wispr Flow: Dictation That Works EverywhereStop typing. Start speaking. 4x faster.

Promoted

Runner Up • Design Tools Product of the Year

More recipients →

Framer Launches

Votive · Free E-commerce TemplateCMS-powered ecommerce template for Framer

Launched on July 21st, 2026

Framer 3.0With Agents, Branching, Community, and an all-new design

Launched on June 17th, 2026

AI-Powered LocalizationTailor your website to many different languages and regions.

Launched on October 4th, 2023

Framer SitesDesign and publish websites faster than ever before

Launched on May 25th, 2022

Framer Sites BetaDesign real websites right on the canvas, publish in seconds

Launched on January 19th, 2022

View all Framer launches

4.8

Based on 258 reviews

Review Framer?

Reviewers mostly see Framer as a fast, design-first way to build polished landing pages and marketing sites, especially for people already comfortable with Figma. They praise its responsive layouts, strong animation tools, quick publishing, and generally solid performance. Makers of Trupeer and Kodezi say it helped them ship animated sites quickly without engineering bottlenecks. The main caveats are familiar: onboarding can feel harder than expected, CMS and integrations are limited for complex sites, and pricing, billing, or support can frustrate some users.

+255

Summarized with AI

Pros

easy to use (53)

no-code platform (34)

fast performance (24)

animation capabilities (19)

responsive design (12)

AI design features (9)

CMS features (9)

Figma integration (9)

flexible canvas (9)

community support (7)

Cons

complex setup (9)

lack of advanced features (9)

limited CMS functionality (5)

high pricing (4)

unresponsive support (3)

real-time collaboration (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

•1 review

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)no-code platform (34)

As someone who builds complex backend architectures and deployment pipelines, spending days tweaking CSS and frontend layouts for a landing page is a massive productivity killer. Framer is fantastic because it perfectly aligns with the "build and ship fast" mindset. It allows me to design and publish highly responsive, visually stunning websites in hours instead of days. The performance out of the box is incredible, and the no-code environment feels intuitive, letting me focus my coding efforts on the actual core product rather than the marketing site.

What needs improvement

While it's the perfect tool for fast landing pages, the CMS functionality can feel a bit restrictive if you are trying to build more complex, data-driven structures. Additionally, if you are an indie hacker or a developer spinning up multiple micro-projects and staging environments, the pricing structure per site can scale up faster than expected compared to traditional hosting.

vs Alternatives

I considered Webflow, WordPress, and simply hard-coding my landing pages from scratch using Next.js and Tailwind CSS. I chose Framer over custom coding because it dramatically reduces my time-to-market. I chose it over Webflow because Framer's interface feels much more like a modern design tool (similar to Figma), making the transition from design to a live, fast-performing site completely seamless without a steep learning curve.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

802 views4mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)community support (7)Figma integration (9)no-code platform (34)AI design features (9)responsive design (12)CMS features (9)animation capabilities (19)flexible canvas (9)

Framer has revolutionized how I prototype and ship interactive websites. With 8+ years in UI/UX and 200+ projects shipped—including standout sites for Hoffman Homes and Doceo—Framer's blend of design freedom and no-code deployment saves my clients time while delivering highly polished, interactive results. Animation and responsive design tools are top-notch, and Figma integration simplifies handoffs and iterations. Community support for tough challenges is a major plus.

What needs improvement

unresponsive support (3)complex setup (9)high pricing (4)real-time collaboration (2)lack of advanced features (9)limited CMS functionality (5)

Framer's steep learning curve may challenge non-technical designers switching from Figma—transition guides and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption. CMS flexibility is solid, but advanced filtering or more robust relationships, like in WordPress, would unlock more use cases. Editor performance slows on heavy, animation-rich pages; more optimization would help agency use. Real-time collaboration is good but could be more robust, with conflict resolution and version tracking. And, a broader range of enterprise-grade templates would make project starts even faster.

vs Alternatives

I chose Framer because it uniquely combines prototyping power with production-ready deployment. Unlike Figma (design only) or Webflow (steeper learning curve), Framer lets me iterate quickly and ship polished, interactive sites directly to clients. The animation capabilities and no-code flexibility give me the creative control I need without sacrificing speed.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

940 views9mo ago

•1 review

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)Figma integration (9)no-code platform (34)animation capabilities (19)

Framer is incredibly easy to use once you get past the basics. The no-code approach is genuinely powerful and allows designers to ship production-ready websites without writing code. Performance is fast both in the editor and on live sites, even when using animation-heavy layouts.

Animation capabilities are one of Framer’s biggest strengths — creating smooth interactions and modern motion feels natural and intuitive. On top of that, the Figma integration is seamless, making the transition from design to a live, interactive website surprisingly frictionless.

What needs improvement

complex setup (9)

The biggest challenge is the initial setup. Framer can feel overwhelming at first, especially for new users, and the learning curve is steeper than expected for a no-code tool. Some advanced features are still missing or limited, and pricing can feel high for individuals or early-stage projects.

The CMS works well for simpler use cases but becomes restrictive for more complex content structures. Improving onboarding, documentation, and flexibility in these areas would make the experience even stronger.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

608 views6mo ago

•1 review

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)no-code platform (34)

What needs improvement

vs Alternatives

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

802 views4mo ago

•3 reviews

What's great

What needs improvement

unresponsive support (3)complex setup (9)high pricing (4)real-time collaboration (2)lack of advanced features (9)limited CMS functionality (5)

vs Alternatives

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

940 views9mo ago

•1 review

What's great

easy to use (53)fast performance (24)Figma integration (9)no-code platform (34)animation capabilities (19)

What needs improvement

complex setup (9)

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

608 views6mo ago