It's 2026, and so much is possible with AI. There's no reason anyone should be paying for something as simple as timestamped comments. Feedback is such an integral part of a video editor's workflow, you make something, you invite your team to weigh in, you collaborate. And oftentimes, let's be honest, you don't get the feedback you want.
Again, in 2026, when we have so much data on what makes a good edit for your objective, we shouldn't be limited to that. AI should be harnessed to give you as much tried-and-tested feedback as possible.
This is exactly why we've built Review -- a free tool that gets you feedback from your team as well as from AI. Our AI has watched thousands of hours of video across several different categories, and it gives you the best feedback for whatever your stated goal is. It notifies you whenever new comments land on your video, and it lets you share with an unlimited number of people. You can leave rich feedback too: draw on the frame, drop a pin on the exact spot you mean, or select a range on the timeline
Eddie AI
Thanks so much for the hunt, @thisiskp_
You know how this story goes: we were using a bunch of tools that weren’t great or were overpriced and we thought, what the heck, we can do this better.
And so we did.
Hello, Review by Eddie AI.
We’re an agentic AI video editing co for pros. We make a lot of videos in our team. I have lots and lots of feedback for my team in AI science, software eng, design, and video marketing.
Leaving timestamped comments on a video is not revolutionary.
So why is frame.io so expensive? And so many tools are meh.
This is a tax on video storytelling.
As a team and as a company we are driven to enable more people to tell more and better video stories.
Huddling with your team on the latest version of the edit and to get their feedback on how the cut lands is part of this.
So welcome Review.
It’s free.
And there is a novel twist: you can ask Eddie AI for feedback too. It’s surprisingly good!
Try it and let me know what you think. It's my turn to receive feedback :)
The no-login, no-reupload flow is probably the strongest part here. getting feedback on a cut should be quick, but it often turns into another tool, another upload, version confusion, and scattered notes. as someone working on launch and product videos, turning frame-accurate comments directly into an actionable to-do list sounds genuinely useful :)
The AI reviewer is the part I'd be most curious to test. does Eddie mainly catch objective issues like pacing, dead space, audio, and unclear structure, or can it also understand the intended audience and give more subjective feedback on whether the story actually lands?
Eddie AI
@andrasczeizel Hey man, this is such a great question!! And something we considered while building this feature. To be clear, the AI feedback tool first asks you clarifying questions, such as what kind of video you're making (talking head, YouTube style, explainer, or short form content), and understands which platform you're publishing on and so on and so forth. Before analyzing your video, running it against data, and finally giving you (hopefully) and insightful feedback!!
What I'd love is for you to try it out with your launch and product videos and let us know what you think 💭 💪
Ota
Congrats on the launch! The extension integrations are what stand out here: meeting editors where they already work rather than asking them to leave their timeline is the right call, and native R3D and BRAW ingestion is a detail that will matter a lot to the people who need it.
Curious how Eddie handles pacing decisions, specifically when there's no script to anchor against. For something like a run-and-gun interview where the story only becomes clear in the edit, how does it decide what to cut versus what to keep?
Eddie AI
@faithada Hey, this is a great point. The way it decides the edit is both using your stated objectives and using its understanding of what makes a good edit, which it has been trained on.
The no-login, time-stamped feedback that becomes a to-do list is exactly the friction I hit sharing cuts with non-editors - they leave vague "the middle drags" notes with no timecode. Day-one question: does a reviewer just open a rendered preview link, or do they need anything installed? And when a note turns into a to-do, does it carry the exact timecode back into Premiere or Resolve so I jump straight to that frame, or is it a separate checklist I have to line up against the timeline myself?
Eddie AI
@leo404 Awesome, thanks. I would say try it out! You don't need anything installed.
thanks, no-install for reviewers is exactly what makes it shareable. The other half I'm still curious about: once a reviewer note becomes a to-do, does it carry the exact timecode back into Premiere or Resolve so I jump straight to that frame, or is it a separate checklist I have to line up against the timeline by hand?
One thing that would make Eddie even more useful for me is multi-language transcript support for interview cuts. Half my interviews are in Spanish and a few in Portuguese, and right now the auto-detect struggles with mixed-language dialogue. Adding a clean way to switch transcription language mid-project (or auto-detect per speaker) would save a ton of cleanup time before the rough cut lands in Premiere.
Eddie AI
@necla170457 Great question. Yes we support projects with multiple languages in the same go.
Timestamped feedback beats "make it pop" comments in a doc, no contest. I build approval flows for written content and the pattern matches: feedback anchored to the exact spot kills half the revision cycles. Does Eddie's AI feedback ever disagree with the human reviewers, and who wins?
Eddie AI
@vladimir_iudin Such an interesting thought. To be clear, Eddie's AI feedback feature works independently. It stands as supplemental to the human feedback. I would encourage you to try it out!!! Lmk what you think:)
the "ask Eddie to review your edit before a human sees it" part is the feature I'd actually use daily. so much of editing feedback is just catching your own pacing/continuity mistakes before someone else has to point them out, and doing that at 2am before a client call is a real problem worth solving. does the AI review get sharper over time based on what your team actually flags as important vs what it flags, or is it the same generic pass every time regardless of who's on the review?
Eddie AI
@omri_ben_shoham1 Yes, the AI review does get sharper over time. We have another feature releasing next week, which will accentuate this even more. I would say just try it out and let me know what you think.