I’m Rayimbek, Co-founder, and CMO at Command Center.
First I wanted to say thank you for supporting us on the beginning of our journey!
Command Center
The problem we're solving is: If AIs can write code 100× faster, why aren’t teams shipping 100× faster?
Because the work moved:
• Power-users say 50%+ of “AI coding” time is spent reading, because they want to understand the AI's changes.
• Much of the rest is spent cleaning up AI output.
0% of developers interviewed say that any existing tool helps. AI "code reviewers" find bugs but don't change their need to understand every line themselves. "Agent managers" help AI's write more code, but AI's are already coding faster than people can keep up. The bottleneck is still a human who has to gain enough confidence in the code to be on call for it at 3am.
We’re attacking the real bottlenecks. We already built a heavier-weight codebase-learning product that made devs up to 4× faster. Our team has trained 500 engineers (including ~10 YC founders), and we have Ph. D. expertise in code analysis. A thread we wrote on the cognitive science of codebase learning and why that 4x is possible hit 500k views. Now we’re productizing that know-how.
To our incredible customer base - Thank you.
Your feedback, encouragement, and belief in what we’re building have fueled every step of this journey. We truly wouldn’t be here without you. ❤️
We’d love to hear what you think in the comments! And we can’t wait to see what you build.
@rayimbek "The bottleneck is still a human who has to gain enough confidence in the code to be on call for it at 3am."
This is so real and reason enough for Command Center to exist for those moments that define the reliability and confidence in your platform. What an essential product for any one using AI-assisted coding.
Here's the thing nobody talks about with AI coding:
We're drowning in code that writes itself. GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude—they're all insanely fast at generating functions and files.
But shipping velocity? Still stuck.
The new bottleneck isn't writing—it's trust.
You can't just merge what AI spits out. You need to actually understand it. Line by line. Because when production breaks at 3am, you're the one getting paged, not the AI.
So devs spend half their time reading AI-generated code like it's someone else's messy homework. The other half? Cleaning up weird patterns and refactoring things that technically work but feel off.
Every tool out there misses this. Code reviewers catch bugs but don't make comprehension faster. Agentic coding tools just generate more code—which makes the problem worse, not better.
Command Center built something different 🎯
They're not helping AI write faster (we don't need that). They're helping engineers review and refactor 20x faster so you can actually ship with confidence.
Why this team gets it:
→ They've trained 500+ engineers on codebase learning → Built a product that already makes devs 4x faster → Have Ph.D.-level expertise in how developers actually think through code → Their thread on cognitive science + codebases hit 500k views
They're solving the problem everyone feels but nobody's named yet: AI moved the work, it didn't eliminate it.
@rayimbek and the Command Center team are here all day!
What's your biggest pain point reviewing AI-generated code? 👇
Report
Would we be able to use this tool for auditing and testing as well? A custom auditing AI that doesn't spiral into code breaks and hallucinations would be amazing.
We also have a testgen agent in the works. I've taught some of the best engineers in the world a new approach to test-writing, and now we've taught an AI.
Report
@jimmykoppel smart contract auditing would be awesome. And general vulnerability and script testing to make sure everything works and is secure.
So far I mostly code in JS/TSX though wanted to eventually include React Native or Kotlin to my stack for mobile apps.
If it handles all these different platforms that is amazing!
This solves a definite need. Maybe I'm missing something but how does this work with existing IDE / coding workflows that are using Cursor or Claude? Can I just run this in a window next to Cursor and as Cursor does something it will pick up on it or do I need to commit the changes first to get this to work, at which point it's too late? Thanks for the insight.
@joshua_lippiner1 It does! The live diff view will pick up changes in real time, while the walkthroughs can be generated on the current changes, any past commit, or any open pull requests. It also takes snapshots (see More->Snapshots) to provide arbitrary undo and redo on any changes made by human or AI. You can run it from a tab in your browser, and can also open it in your IDE using the Simple Browser command.
Report
I’m not an engineer, but I’ve worked with a few who’ve tried using AI to help them code, and you’ve picked the real problem.
On a side note the "Get started" button isn't working on the website.
Great explanation here in the video.
Kudos to the team.
Report
I’m not an engineer, but I’ve worked with a few who’ve tried using AI to help them code, and you’ve picked the real problem.
On a side note the "Get started" button isn't working on the website.
Command Center
Hey Product Hunters! 👋
I’m Rayimbek, Co-founder, and CMO at Command Center.
First I wanted to say thank you for supporting us on the beginning of our journey!
Command Center
The problem we're solving is: If AIs can write code 100× faster, why aren’t teams shipping 100× faster?
Because the work moved:
• Power-users say 50%+ of “AI coding” time is spent reading, because they want to understand the AI's changes.
• Much of the rest is spent cleaning up AI output.
0% of developers interviewed say that any existing tool helps. AI "code reviewers" find bugs but don't change their need to understand every line themselves. "Agent managers" help AI's write more code, but AI's are already coding faster than people can keep up. The bottleneck is still a human who has to gain enough confidence in the code to be on call for it at 3am.
We’re attacking the real bottlenecks. We already built a heavier-weight codebase-learning product that made devs up to 4× faster. Our team has trained 500 engineers (including ~10 YC founders), and we have Ph. D. expertise in code analysis. A thread we wrote on the cognitive science of codebase learning and why that 4x is possible hit 500k views. Now we’re productizing that know-how.
To our incredible customer base - Thank you.
Your feedback, encouragement, and belief in what we’re building have fueled every step of this journey. We truly wouldn’t be here without you. ❤️
We’d love to hear what you think in the comments! And we can’t wait to see what you build.
Try Command Center for FREE -> Sign Up for Command Center
Twitter/X - https://x.com/ccdotdev
LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/ccdotdev
Unslack
@rayimbek "The bottleneck is still a human who has to gain enough confidence in the code to be on call for it at 3am."
This is so real and reason enough for Command Center to exist for those moments that define the reliability and confidence in your platform. What an essential product for any one using AI-assisted coding.
Command Center
Why we built it. Such a huge need, yet no-one else working on it.
@rayimbek congrats on the launch!!
Netlify
Hey PH fam 👋
Pumped to hunt Command Center today! 🚀
Here's the thing nobody talks about with AI coding:
We're drowning in code that writes itself. GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude—they're all insanely fast at generating functions and files.
But shipping velocity? Still stuck.
The new bottleneck isn't writing—it's trust.
You can't just merge what AI spits out. You need to actually understand it. Line by line. Because when production breaks at 3am, you're the one getting paged, not the AI.
So devs spend half their time reading AI-generated code like it's someone else's messy homework. The other half? Cleaning up weird patterns and refactoring things that technically work but feel off.
Every tool out there misses this. Code reviewers catch bugs but don't make comprehension faster. Agentic coding tools just generate more code—which makes the problem worse, not better.
Command Center built something different 🎯
They're not helping AI write faster (we don't need that). They're helping engineers review and refactor 20x faster so you can actually ship with confidence.
Why this team gets it:
→ They've trained 500+ engineers on codebase learning
→ Built a product that already makes devs 4x faster
→ Have Ph.D.-level expertise in how developers actually think through code
→ Their thread on cognitive science + codebases hit 500k views
They're solving the problem everyone feels but nobody's named yet: AI moved the work, it didn't eliminate it.
@rayimbek and the Command Center team are here all day!
What's your biggest pain point reviewing AI-generated code? 👇
Would we be able to use this tool for auditing and testing as well? A custom auditing AI that doesn't spiral into code breaks and hallucinations would be amazing.
Command Center
Yeah! What kind of auditing are you working on?
We also have a testgen agent in the works. I've taught some of the best engineers in the world a new approach to test-writing, and now we've taught an AI.
@jimmykoppel smart contract auditing would be awesome. And general vulnerability and script testing to make sure everything works and is secure.
So far I mostly code in JS/TSX though wanted to eventually include React Native or Kotlin to my stack for mobile apps.
If it handles all these different platforms that is amazing!
Superflex
This is an awesome product! Got to use it at a hackathon that @rayimbek recently hosted, great job team!
Command Center
@superaibek Thank you for the feedback!
This solves a definite need. Maybe I'm missing something but how does this work with existing IDE / coding workflows that are using Cursor or Claude? Can I just run this in a window next to Cursor and as Cursor does something it will pick up on it or do I need to commit the changes first to get this to work, at which point it's too late? Thanks for the insight.
Command Center
@joshua_lippiner1 It does! The live diff view will pick up changes in real time, while the walkthroughs can be generated on the current changes, any past commit, or any open pull requests. It also takes snapshots (see More->Snapshots) to provide arbitrary undo and redo on any changes made by human or AI. You can run it from a tab in your browser, and can also open it in your IDE using the Simple Browser command.
I’m not an engineer, but I’ve worked with a few who’ve tried using AI to help them code, and you’ve picked the real problem.
On a side note the "Get started" button isn't working on the website.
Great explanation here in the video.
Kudos to the team.
I’m not an engineer, but I’ve worked with a few who’ve tried using AI to help them code, and you’ve picked the real problem.
On a side note the "Get started" button isn't working on the website.
Great explanation here in the video.
Kudos to the team.