Claude by Anthropic

A family of foundational AI models

5.0•853 reviews•

62K followers

A family of foundational AI models

5.0•853 reviews•

62K followers

Visit website

LLMs

•

AI Chatbots

We're an AI research company that builds reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. Our first product is Claude, an AI assistant for tasks at any scale.

Claude by Anthropic Reviews

The community submitted 853 reviews to tell us what they like about Claude by Anthropic, what Claude by Anthropic can do better, and more.

5.0

Based on 853 reviews

Review Claude by Anthropic?

Reviewers mostly praise Claude for strong reasoning, long-context memory, and writing that feels more natural and less generic than rivals. Many say it excels at coding, debugging, multi-file projects, and acting like a real thinking partner across strategy, analysis, and content work. Founders of Fathom and UXPin say it helped customize workflows and produce more production-ready output, while the maker of IFTTT highlights tool use and MCP. The main complaints are strict message limits, weak image features, and some app or context-sharing friction.

+857

Summarized with AI

Pros

AI assistant (97)

code generation (66)

contextual understanding (49)

reasoning capabilities (45)

data analysis (27)

creative writing (25)

fast performance (21)

nuanced responses (19)

ethical AI (15)

context aware (12)

Cons

message limits (19)

typography issues (8)

contextual understanding (2)

cross-surface context sharing (2)

limited image output (2)

long context windows (2)

Pros

Cons

Reviews

All Reviews

Most Informative

Founder Reviews (789)

Other Reviews (64)

Company Info

anthropic.com/claude App Store Play Store

Claude by Anthropic Info

Launched in 2023

View 40 launches

Forum

p/claude

Awards

View all

SocialX

Similar Products

AssemblyAI Voice Agent API

One API to build production-ready voice agents

4.8(29 reviews)

API Artificial Intelligence

DeepSeek

Open-source LLM optimized for advanced reasoning and code

4.9(44 reviews)

LLMs AI Chatbots

GPTBots.ai

Build Smarter AI Teams, End-to-End.

4.9(22 reviews)

Customer support tools No-code Platforms

Runbear

Custom ChatGPT for your Slack, Teams, HubSpot, and more!

5.0(7 reviews)

Productivity AI Chatbots

Sparks AI

A platform for your agents, teammates & everything you build

AI Chatbots

Flowise

Build AI Agents, Visually

4.8(4 reviews)

No-code Platforms AI Chatbots

used Claude by Anthropic to build Params Editor for Chromium Browsers

•3 reviews

Claude was the unsung hero behind much of Params Editor's core functionality. With its direct implementation style and practical approach to problem-solving, Claude handled the majority of feature development with remarkable efficiency. One of the most pleasant surprises came when Claude accidentally implemented hot reloading while setting up the development environment—a feature I hadn't even requested but that saved countless hours during development! When other AI assistance reached its limits, Claude consistently stepped in to maintain development momentum, demonstrating an impressive ability to understand the project's vision and translate it into functional code.

Report

121 views1yr ago

Octomind

•20 reviews

Disclaimer: We are on the waitlist and haven't used it actively...But if Claude 2 can deliver on the promised features, it will be a game-changer: 4X cheaper than GPT-4-32k is a big selling point as we are running agent strategies in production, which costs a lot. The better performance across multiple benchmarks, including math, coding, and reasoning, could be decisive for our use case: writing, maintaining, and healing end-to-end tests for UI. From our experience, achieving SOTA and tractable, consistent performance simultaneously in these functional areas is complex and could be a unique achievement. Code that does what it is supposed to and compiles is significantly more complex than letting the LLM hallucinate more creative answers. Compilers don't like creativity ;) But the most important innovation is increasing the context length. So far, we always had to work on stripped-down versions of HTML, with 100k and 200k context that would change and should yield significantly better results. Congrats on your launch; keep on innovating! We can't wait to try it out!

Report

101 views3yr ago

used Claude by Anthropic to build Slashy

•20 reviews

Claude is the heart of Slashy's AI layer. Its ability to follow nuanced instructions, maintain voice consistency, and handle long email threads without losing context is unmatched. When we tested LLMs for writing emails that actually sound human, Claude won.

Alternatives Considered

Report

1 view5d ago

•23 reviews

Claude is seriously impressive – it feels like chatting with a thoughtful, well-read friend who’s also a genius coder. It handles long documents like a champ (think 200K+ tokens), gives nuanced answers, and doesn’t just summarize – it actually understands. I’ve used it for writing, editing, research, and even debugging code, and it rarely misses. What I really love is how calm and conversational it feels – less robotic, more human. Sometimes it can get a bit wordy, but I’d rather have that than dry, one-liner replies. If you care about clarity, reasoning, and a solid mix of creativity and logic, Claude is easily one of the best out there.

What's great

AI assistant (97)code generation (66)long context windows (8)contextual understanding (49)creative writing (25)nuanced responses (19)

Report

41 views1yr ago

•9 reviews

Here's a strategic review of Claude 3 (latest version): Claude 3 stands out with its exceptional context handling and analytical capabilities. Having used it extensively, here's what matters: Key Strengths: Superior code understanding: Remarkably accurate for debugging and development assistance Data analysis prowess: Excels at complex visualization tasks and data-rich queries Contextual awareness: Maintains conversation flow and relevance throughout long exchanges Nuanced responses: Provides thoughtful, well-reasoned answers that demonstrate understanding Performance improvements: Enhanced reasoning capabilities over previous versions More accurate technical analysis Faster response times Better handling of complex, multi-step tasks Areas for consideration: Message limits on Pro tier could be more flexible Typography interface elements could be refined Currently using it for code review, data analysis, and technical documentation. The accuracy and depth of responses consistently exceed expectations. Notably efficient for developers and analysts who need precise, contextual assistance. Upvoted for pushing AI capabilities forward. 🚀

What's great

fast performance (21)data analysis (27)contextual understanding (49)nuanced responses (19)reasoning capabilities (45)

What needs improvement

typography issues (8)message limits (19)

Report

35 views1yr ago

•3 reviews

As a software developer, I've had the opportunity to work with various AI assistants, and I must say that Claude by Anthropic stands out from the crowd. While my opinion may be slightly biased due to my background, I believe Claude deserves a solid 4 out of 5 stars for its impressive capabilities. Claude outperforms other leading AI assistants like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Llama 3.1 in several key areas . Its human-like responses and exceptional coding capabilities are particularly noteworthy . The way Claude understands context and generates code is truly remarkable. However, there are a couple of areas where Claude could improve. The pricing of its API can be a limitation for developers who want to use it extensively for coding purposes . This may hinder its widespread adoption in the programming community. Additionally, while Claude's context window of 200k tokens is substantial, it's worth noting that Gemini can handle up to 2M tokens , which could be advantageous in certain scenarios. While there is room for improvement in terms of pricing and token capacity, its overall performance and ethical standards make it a strong contender in the market. I'm excited to see how Anthropic continues to enhance Claude's capabilities in the future.

What's great

code generation (66)ethical AI (15)contextual understanding (49)

What needs improvement

long context windows (2)

Report

42 views2yr ago

•1 review

What's great

Im amazed with the reasoning of the claude models. Specifically opus series has been proved incredible in terms of large context window, intellectual reasoning and understanding the context. I also like code generation and bug fixing which pushes us to faster building, quick fixing and instant execution. Loved it!!

vs Alternatives

Long context understanding, fewer explaination and accurate marking of goal execution better than others.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

84 views4mo ago

•2 reviews

I am using 3.7 strictly for coding, rarely something else. And it is by far superior to anything else I tried. For content writing, I still prefer GPT, but for coding, just wow! Great job! First time I tried claude 3.7, I asked him to create custom sortable lightweight JS for me, and it created a solution that I couldnt create in a week. Without my instructions, it worked with nested lists, grids, had smooth animations, and much more. Crazy.

What's great

code generation (66)

Report

21 views1yr ago

•2 reviews

What's great

AI assistant (97)code generation (66)contextual understanding (49)reasoning capabilities (45)

As for now, really good, my go to choice nowdays. Sonnet 4.5 just a little syncopath, but less then other alternatives.

What needs improvement

Bad image vision compared to Gemini

vs Alternatives

ChatGPT by OpenAI Gemini

Fair pricing for usage, good initial entry, high customization. Maybe in time will fall off, but for now, really good.

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

113 views8mo ago

•8 reviews

Areas for consideration: Message limits on Pro tier could be more flexible Typography interface elements could be refined Currently using it for code review, data analysis, and technical documentation. The accuracy and depth of responses consistently exceed expectations. Notably efficient for developers and analysts who need precise, contextual assistance. Upvoted for pushing AI capabilities forward.

What's great

data analysis (27)contextual understanding (49)

What needs improvement

typography issues (8)message limits (19)

Report

17 views1yr ago

•2 reviews

Incredible tool. Before I used it, I only had concepts. When I finally used it, I was blown away by the results. I used to automate some content management tasks. The frontend code it generated was nearly perfect. All that needed to be done was change a few variables, move it to my own infrastructure and connecting a database. I can't wait to see how Claude evolves!

What's great

code generation (66)

Report

5 views1yr ago

•3 reviews

What's great

Claude by Anthropic is a highly capable and reliable AI assistant, especially strong in reasoning, code understanding, and clear communication. It provides thoughtful, context‑aware responses while maintaining a strong focus on safety and usability. Overall, it’s a valuable tool for both technical and analytical workflows.

What needs improvement

inaccurate image generation (1)limited output flexibility (1)

Ratings

Ease of use

Reliability

Value for money

Customization

Report

16 views3mo ago

•3 reviews

I have Claude open all the time, and use it multiple times per day. The model(s) themselves are awesome, but my rating is more about the Mac app. It's clunky, even after all these months of using it, and it often doesn't do what it says (try to save a PDF of an artifact it's created for you? Good luck—it silently fails so often).

What's great

AI assistant (97)

What needs improvement

user-friendly interface (1)reliable outputs (1)

Report

8 views10mo ago