Does ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Google's AI recommend your business when customers ask? Free scan, no signup. 600+ businesses measured into a live index. Human-reviewed report US$79 once, with an AI-traffic beacon that counts the visitors AI actually sends you.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for Are you found by AI?
Maker
📌
Hey Product Hunt, Huxley here, from the Sunshine Coast in Australia.
I kept watching small businesses spend months on SEO while ChatGPT quietly recommended their competitor instead. So I built the thing I couldn't find: a scanner that measures whether the AI engines actually say your name when a customer asks, and shows who they name instead.
Since launch we've measured 600+ businesses and published the anonymised results as a live index: 19 industry leaderboards that grow every night.
The honest part: I ran it on this tool's own site when it was three days old and scored 1 out of 100. It was right. No entity, no mentions, nothing for AI to trust yet. Under our newest, stricter scoring it sits at 4 today. Building visibility takes longer than building software, and I'm doing both in public.
Two things shipped this week that I'm proud of: every question is now sampled multiple times with a majority vote (AI answers wobble; one-shot scores are noise), and every report now includes a one-line AI-traffic beacon so you can count the real visitors ChatGPT and friends send you. Visibility is the input; that's the outcome.
Last week it became the #1 AI-visibility tool on There's An AI For That and #3 trending overall, which was a strange week.
The scan is free, no signup, about 60 seconds. Run it on your business and tell me if it gets you right. I'll be here all day.
Report
Plugged in my small site and was honestly surprised my brand came up zero times across the major models, thought I was doing better than that. The free scan is genuinely useful before you even think about paying.
Report
Maker
@abdulkadir97114 Thanks for your comment! Glad you liked the product, the full scan will try 12 different queries plus other signals across the web that AI uses to recommend you.
Report
@huxley_peckham - Great idea, and I love that some of the process is 'Human reviewed', how in-depth is this and on the on-going plan is that also a human review or just AI?
Report
Maker
@codeandsea Cheers Brent. On the one-off report, the human review is the judgment calls, not the numbers: I check the AI read the business right (correct entity, category, location), that the named competitors are real businesses and not hallucinations, and that the fix plan actually makes sense for that site. The measurements themselves are automated on purpose, every engine answer is quoted verbatim in the report, so you're reading receipts, not my summary.
Monitoring is the automated part by design: same questions, same method every week, so the trend is comparable. I review the first few reports of each new subscription to make sure the setup is right, and every email the system sends has a reply-to that lands with me.. a human reads every reply. Send me anything that looks off; catching weirdness (like AI confusing a business with a same-name company) is half the product.
Report
@huxley_peckham - Hey thanks for the fast response, I love this kind of attention to support from fellow founders and for me this builds trust and confidence in using a tool. I've tested a couple of my sites with the free option, but not had the time to go through the results yet, but they seem to be a relatively deep analysis.
What I did like was with the first site I submitted I got a link vie email to the report that I was able to print (save as PDF) for later review. However when I submitted the second site, I did not get the email link, so although I was still able to save as PDF, the output was not has well layed out by printing the results as part of the home screen. May be sending an email for all submissions would be possible?
I want to review these two sites, but for now they are just holding pages, once I expand the sites with more content I'll probably go for the one-off premium report.
Report
Maker
@codeandsea Brent, you found a real bug — thank you. The report email only fired the first time you entered your email; on any later scan the site remembered you, skipped that step, and never sent the link. That's why site #2 never landed in your inbox.
Fixed and live as of today: every scan now emails you its own report link automatically, and that emailed page is the print-friendly one, so save-as-PDF comes out properly laid out. I ran the exact returning-visitor flow end-to-end before replying to make sure.
If you want the link for that second site without re-running it, reply with the domain (or email me) and I'll dig the original out of the archive. Catches like this are gold — cheers.
Report
@huxley_peckham - Thanks for the update. I'll drop the domain in an email over the weekend if that's OK. No rush in getting back to me with the link though.
I tried with two products and the results were insightful!
As GEO is a relatively new thing it is super helpful to get detailed guidance like the one provided by "Are you found by AI?"
Congrats for the launch and wish you all success!
Report
Maker
@gxara Thanks Gabriel, appreciate you actually running it on two sites rather than just skimming the page. Which two, and did the fix plan surprise you on either?
Had a look at NodeLand too, "documents are mind maps" is a smart way to frame what Miro and Notion each only do half of. Hope today's treating it well.
Report
Maker
@gxara Cheers! I am glad you liked the platform and the detail we provide. Hope you enjoy the free tools we just launched aswell.
Plugged in my small site and was honestly surprised my brand came up zero times across the major models, thought I was doing better than that. The free scan is genuinely useful before you even think about paying.
@abdulkadir97114 Thanks for your comment! Glad you liked the product, the full scan will try 12 different queries plus other signals across the web that AI uses to recommend you.
@huxley_peckham - Great idea, and I love that some of the process is 'Human reviewed', how in-depth is this and on the on-going plan is that also a human review or just AI?
@codeandsea Cheers Brent. On the one-off report, the human review is the judgment calls, not the numbers: I check the AI read the business right (correct entity, category, location), that the named competitors are real businesses and not hallucinations, and that the fix plan actually makes sense for that site. The measurements themselves are automated on purpose, every engine answer is quoted verbatim in the report, so you're reading receipts, not my summary.
Monitoring is the automated part by design: same questions, same method every week, so the trend is comparable. I review the first few reports of each new subscription to make sure the setup is right, and every email the system sends has a reply-to that lands with me.. a human reads every reply. Send me anything that looks off; catching weirdness (like AI confusing a business with a same-name company) is half the product.
@huxley_peckham - Hey thanks for the fast response, I love this kind of attention to support from fellow founders and for me this builds trust and confidence in using a tool. I've tested a couple of my sites with the free option, but not had the time to go through the results yet, but they seem to be a relatively deep analysis.
What I did like was with the first site I submitted I got a link vie email to the report that I was able to print (save as PDF) for later review. However when I submitted the second site, I did not get the email link, so although I was still able to save as PDF, the output was not has well layed out by printing the results as part of the home screen. May be sending an email for all submissions would be possible?
I want to review these two sites, but for now they are just holding pages, once I expand the sites with more content I'll probably go for the one-off premium report.
@codeandsea Brent, you found a real bug — thank you. The report email only fired the first time you entered your email; on any later scan the site remembered you, skipped that step, and never sent the link. That's why site #2 never landed in your inbox.
Fixed and live as of today: every scan now emails you its own report link automatically, and that emailed page is the print-friendly one, so save-as-PDF comes out properly laid out. I ran the exact returning-visitor flow end-to-end before replying to make sure.
If you want the link for that second site without re-running it, reply with the domain (or email me) and I'll dig the original out of the archive. Catches like this are gold — cheers.
@huxley_peckham - Thanks for the update. I'll drop the domain in an email over the weekend if that's OK. No rush in getting back to me with the link though.
NodeLand
I tried with two products and the results were insightful!
As GEO is a relatively new thing it is super helpful to get detailed guidance like the one provided by "Are you found by AI?"
Congrats for the launch and wish you all success!
@gxara Thanks Gabriel, appreciate you actually running it on two sites rather than just skimming the page. Which two, and did the fix plan surprise you on either?
Had a look at NodeLand too, "documents are mind maps" is a smart way to frame what Miro and Notion each only do half of. Hope today's treating it well.
@gxara Cheers! I am glad you liked the platform and the detail we provide. Hope you enjoy the free tools we just launched aswell.