Looking for feedback on how to make early-stage crypto MVP more trustworthy
Hey PH đź‘‹
I recently built a small MVP: https://let-site-six.vercel.app
— it’s a concept around connecting digital value with human life metrics.
I’d love to understand from other makers and crypto/product people what makes you trust (or not trust) a new project at this stage.
I’m not here to promote, I just want to learn from people who’ve built or evaluated early products.
đź’¬ A few specific questions:
What makes you personally trust a crypto or token-based product?
What do you usually look for first — team, roadmap, design, transparency, utility?
What kind of information do you expect on the site before even considering to buy/join?
Do you think crypto MVPs should already have a community (Discord/TG), or that’s too early?
How can an early project show legitimacy without sounding “salesy”?
Any honest thoughts or examples from your own experience would really help. Thanks in advance! 🙏
Replies
Early trust in crypto products usually doesn’t come from design or roadmap, it comes from verifiable constraints.
Things like visible on-chain behavior, irreversible actions, or even simple “what can go wrong here” clarity tend to matter more than polished messaging at MVP stage.
Curious, are you trying to build trust through transparency of the system itself, or through external signals like community + social proof first?