Timeln - Your entire reading history, as context for any LLM

Hey Product Hunt, I'm Rahul. I built Timeln because I kept losing things I had already read. Not bookmarks — I had thousands of those. The problem was three weeks later, when I half-remembered a number from a paper, or a decision from a thread, and had no way to get back to it except tab archaeology. I'd tried the usual second-brain apps. I bounced off all of them for the same reason: they work if you maintain them, and I never did. So Timeln has no filing step at all. ⭐ Save it with ⌘C ⌘C ⌘C Tap ⌘C three times in a row and whatever you copied is saved. No window opens, nothing takes focus, nothing makes a sound — a small "Memory saved" card fades in at the corner and you keep reading. Text becomes a note. A bare URL gets fetched and the actual page gets saved, not the 40-character link. Files from Finder — PDFs, docs, images — get ingested. Screenshots too. ⭐ Ask it with ⌘\ A search bar drops into the middle of your screen, over whatever you're in, including full-screen apps. Ask the way you'd ask a colleague: "what did we decide about the pricing tiers?" It runs a multi-round search — it searches, reads what it found, then searches again to fill its own gaps — and the answer appears with its sources underneath. Press esc and you're back in your document, cursor where you left it. Timeln never opened. ⭐ Nothing to organize No folders, no tags, no backlinks to maintain. New saves connect themselves to old saves in the background. That's the whole bet: anything you have to think about while you're researching is something you'll skip when you're moving fast. ⭐ 20% off for Product Hunt Use code PRODUCTHUNT for 20% off — valid for the next 48 hours. ⭐ Where this is going Right now the Mac app is one door into the same memory. Over the next two months I'm opening the others — WhatsApp, so you can save and ask from your phone, and an MCP server so Claude and Cursor can read the same corpus you've been saving into. ⭐ Being frank about the limits It's early. Retrieval is good on things you saved with some context around them and weaker on one-line clippings. Non-English content is inconsistent. If you try it and it misses something it obviously should have found, that's the feedback I want most — tell me the question you asked and I'll dig into it. I'll be here all day. Tell me what breaks, what's confusing, and what you'd want it plugged into next. — Rahul