Seoprog - Check if ChatGPT and Google can read your site

by
Most SEO tools miss a new problem: people now ask ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity which sites to trust - and many sites are invisible to them. Seoprog reads any page the way Google and AI assistants do, then gives two scores (SEO and AI-readiness) and a plain-English fix list. It watches your pages daily and alerts you if one breaks. Agencies can share white-label client reports. Built for founders, freelancers and small teams. Free to start, no card needed.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
📌
Hi Product Hunt 👋 I build and run a handful of small sites solo, and last year I hit a problem no SEO tool was talking about: people increasingly ask ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity which sites to trust - and it turned out some of my own pages were basically invisible to those AI crawlers. My SEO looked fine. My AI visibility was broken, and nothing told me. So I built Seoprog. Paste a URL and it reads the page the way Google and AI assistants do, then gives you two scores - classic SEO and AI-readiness - plus a plain-English list of what to fix (no dashboards to decode). It also checks whether crawlers like GPTBot and ClaudeBot can actually reach you. The part I lean on most: it monitors your pages every day and emails you the moment something breaks - the page goes down, quietly gets set to noindex, or loses its title tag. You fix a site once and it watches your back, instead of you finding out weeks later that traffic dropped. It's built for solo founders, freelancers and small teams - not enterprise budgets. Free to start, and you can share clean client reports too. I'd genuinely love honest feedback: run your own site through it and tell me what surprised you, or what felt confusing

honestly this looks pretty useful, especially the AI-readiness angle since most tools still ignore that. one thing i'd love to see is a side-by-side compare view where you can drop in a competitor's url and see how your scores stack up against theirs. would make the agency reports way more compelling too.

Maker
Thanks, that means a lot - and yeah, the AI-readiness gap is exactly why I built it, most tools still act like it’s 2020. The competitor side-by-side is a genuinely good call. You’ve actually put your finger on something: the scores already exist per-URL, so running two and showing the gap isn’t a huge leap technically - and you’re right that “here’s you vs your competitor” is a much stronger thing for an agency to hand a client than a standalone report. Adding it to the list, honestly considering it as a near-term one. If you end up trying it on your own site, I’d love to hear what you’d want in that compare view specifically - just the two scores side by side, or the per-check differences too? That’d help me build the right version rather than guessing.