I’m building an all-in-one workspace for systematic reviews what should I get wrong first?

I’m Robin, building EvidenceFlow: a workspace intended to connect systematic-review planning, multi-reviewer screening, data extraction, PRISMA reporting, and meta-analysis.

The problem I am trying to solve is not that researchers lack tools. It is that a typical review often involves several tools and spreadsheets, with manual handoffs between them.

I would value direct feedback from anyone who has built or used complex workflow software:

• Which step should remain specialized rather than being pulled into an all-in-one platform?

• What would make you distrust a new product handling a high-stakes workflow?

• If you were testing an early product, what is the one task you would try first to decide whether it is useful?

I am especially interested in examples involving team collaboration, auditability, data export, and AI assistance with human control.

I will share the product with anyone who asks in the comments and will use the responses to guide the roadmap.